7
$\begingroup$

This is a question i asked on math.stackexchange but i didn't get any answer.

Let $A$ be algebra over commutative ring $k$ and $P_{\bullet}=(P_i,d_i)\rightarrow A$, $k$ projective resolution. Then we have obvious lift of multiplication $f:A\otimes A\rightarrow A$ to $F:P\otimes P \rightarrow P$. Of course there is no reason for $F$ to be associative so we can't claim that $P_{\bullet}$ has algebra structure. Consider the map

$Tor_*(A,A)\otimes Tor_*(A,A)=H_*(P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet})\otimes H_*(P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet})\rightarrow H_*(P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet})\rightarrow H_*(P_{\bullet}\otimes P_{\bullet})=Tor_*(A,A)$

I was wondering if this map gives graded algebra structure on $Tor_*(A,A)$. Do i need any assumptions?

Edit: Can you give me references to any papers about those algebras?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $F$ is a lift of an associative map so is associative up to chain homotopy. $\endgroup$ Nov 15, 2013 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ I believe the Tor algebra has been studied as an $A_\infty$-algebra, can't find the paper right this moment. $\endgroup$ Nov 15, 2013 at 18:34
  • $\begingroup$ This is essentially done in Cartan-Eilenberg (!) $\endgroup$ Nov 15, 2013 at 19:22
  • $\begingroup$ @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez - Sorry I'm not really familiar with this book and can't find it. Could you tell me where exactly should i look. $\endgroup$
    – user35861
    Nov 15, 2013 at 19:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The book has a chapter entitled «Products.» You'll find there indications about the proof of associativity. $\endgroup$ Nov 16, 2013 at 0:53

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

More generally, if $A,B,C,D $ are $k$-algebras, there's a multiplication $$Tor_m^k(A,B)\otimes_k Tor_n^k(C,D)\rightarrow Tor^k_{m+n}(A\otimes_k C,B\otimes_k D)\qquad(1)$$ If you take $C=A$ and $B=D$, this becomes $$Tor_m^k(A,B)\otimes_k Tor_n^k(A,B)\rightarrow Tor^k_{m+n}(A\otimes_A A,B\otimes_k B)$$ and you can compose with the maps induced by multiplication on $A$ and $B$ to get $$Tor_m^k(A,B)\otimes_k Tor_n^k(A,B)\rightarrow Tor_{m+n}^k(A,B)$$

The resulting map is commutative up to a sign (namely $(-1)^{m+n}$).

To get (1), you can represent elements of $Tor_m^k(A,B)$ and $Tor_n^k(A,B)$ as cycles in he appropriate complexes, then tensor these cycles together to get a cycle in the total tensor product complex.

You can find the details, among other places, in Eisenbud's book on commutative algebra, where he mentions that a lot of work has been done on the structure of this algebra in the case where $k$ is a local ring and $A=B$ is the residue field. (Here's where I really wish you'd called your ring $R$ instead of $k$!)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer. For me R is not commutative, k commutative and A is an algebra. $\endgroup$
    – user35861
    Nov 15, 2013 at 20:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.