On the unit $2$-sphere ${\mathbb S}^2$ furnished with the geodesic distance, a subset homeomorphic to a planar disk is called a *cell*. A finite family of cells is a *tiling* if their interiors are mutually disjoint and their union is the whole sphere. My main question is:

**(1) Can the sphere be tiled by congruent cells of an arbitrarily small diameter? If not, how small can the diameters of the cells be?**

An obvious example of a tiling with arbitrarily many congruent cells is obtained by cutting the sphere into $n$ sectors by $n$ uniformly spaced great semicircles, each connecting the North and the South poles. Since the cells' diameter is $\pi$ - the same as the diameter of the whole sphere, they cannot be called small by any means.

A somewhat less obvious example is constructed as follows. Consider the $4k$-faceted polyhedron inscribed in the sphere, consisting of a $2k$-faceted antiprism ($k\ge3$) capped off by two pyramids, as shown below for $k=18$. With the properly chosen altitude of the antiprism, all $4k$ (isosceles-triangular) facets become congruent by design.

${\qquad\qquad\qquad}$

The central projection of the facets to the sphere produces a tiling of the sphere with $4k$ congruent, isosceles-triangular cells of diameter considerably smaller than $\pi$, but greater than $\pi/3$ and converging to $\pi/3$ as $k\to\infty$.

In the special case of $k=5$, the inscribed polyhedron is the regular icosahedron. In this case, if each of its $20$ equilateral triangular facets is barycentrically partitioned into 6 triangles, the central projection to the sphere yields a tiling with $120$ congruent, triangular cells of diameter well below $\pi/3$. No better examples are known to me, which raises the following, specific two questions:

**(2) Is there a tiling of the sphere with an arbitrarily large number of congruent tiles, each of diameter $d\le\pi/3$?**

**(3) Is there a tiling of the sphere with congruent cells of diameter smaller than that in the subdivided-dodecahedral $120$-cell tiling described above?**

Hiroshima Math. J.. Volume 32, Number 3 (2002), 463-540. $\endgroup$ – Joseph O'Rourke Nov 2 '13 at 21:0810more comments