5
$\begingroup$

In Müger's article "Conformal Field Theory and Doplicher-Roberts Reconstruction", he defines the "modular closure" of a braided monoidal category. So every braided monoidal category (and therefore every premodular category, which is a special case, see Bruguières articles) is the subcategory of a modular category, namely of its closure.

Is it known when this inclusion is full? If not, is it possible for an arbitrary premodular category to construct a modular category that contains it as a full subcategory?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I believe the answer to your first question is no: If you take a symmetric tensor category, Müger's construction should give the trivial tensor category.

The answer to your second question is yes. There is always a full inclusion of a braided tensor category $\mathcal{C}$ into its center $\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$, which is modular if $\mathcal{C}$ is pre-modular.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How does this inclusion work? What is the canonical choice of half braiding $\phi: - \otimes X \To X \otimes -$ for a given object $X$? But only the morphisms that commute with the half braiding appear in the Drinfeld centre, right? So how is this an inclusion? $\endgroup$ – Manuel Bärenz Oct 29 '13 at 18:47
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, if one takes the braiding present in $\mathcal{C}$ then all the morphisms in $\mathcal{C}$ satisfy the condition, by the axioms of a braided category. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Manuel Bärenz Oct 29 '13 at 19:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.