I am interested in the set of all non-cocompact Fuchsian lattices which all have a distinguished point as cusp, say $\infty$ in the upper half plane model of the hyperbolic plane. Of course, the Fuchsian lattices may have as many cusps as they like as long as $\infty$ is one of them.

Does there exist a classification of the maximal elements of this set?

  • $\begingroup$ What sort of classification do you expect? $\endgroup$ – Igor Rivin Oct 20 '13 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Igor Rivin: something of the form "the maximal elements are the Fuchsian lattices from the following list...." or "the maximal elements are the lattices which have a fundamental domain of this and that form" $\endgroup$ – Maik Köster Oct 21 '13 at 6:17
  • $\begingroup$ And by "maximal" you mean "of minimal volume"? $\endgroup$ – Igor Rivin Oct 21 '13 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ I consider the lattices to be partially ordered by inclusion. In that sense I mean maximal. The background of my question is as follows: Sometimes there are constructions/properties which are inherited by finite-index subgroups. So if I want to prove this property for all Fuchsian lattices, it suffices to prove it for the (inclusion-)maximal ones. Therefore I wonder whether there is this classification of these maximal Fuchsian lattices (for me only those with cusps are interesting). $\endgroup$ – Maik Köster Oct 21 '13 at 14:41

I don't think there's a simple description of these. For any cover $X\to E$ of surfaces (or orbifolds, if you allow Fuchsian groups with torsion?), there is a corresponding map between moduli spaces of $E$ to the moduli space of $X$. So I think to determine the maximal groups corresponding to a surface $\Sigma_{g,p}$ with genus $g$ and $p$ punctures, you would have to construct all possible (topological) covers of $\Sigma_{g,p}\to \Delta$, and look at the image of the moduli space of $\Delta$ in the moduli space of $\Sigma_{g,p}$. Then the maximal guys would be the ones that missed the images of these sub-moduli spaces. I believe in fact that the images will be subvarieties of the Deligne-Mumford compactification, so this space should be something like a quasi-projective variety (or something more general like a scheme or stack), but I don't know of surfaces in which this has been explicitly computed. However, I haven't done a literature search, but hopefully this might indicate how to make your question more precise, and search the relevant literature.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.