Let $G$ be a group acting on a category $\mathcal{C}$; that is, a monoidal functor $G\rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(\mathcal{C})$, where the latter is the 2-group of auto-equivalences of $G$. Explicitly, this means for every $g\in G$ we have an functor $F_g : \mathcal{C}\rightarrow \mathcal{C}$ such that $F_1$ is the identity functor and the functor $F_{g^{-1}}$ is the quasi-inverse to $F_g$. Moreover, for every pair $g,h\in G$, we have a fixed isomorphism of functors $i_{g,h}:F_{gh} \rightarrow F_g \circ F_h$, so that for for any triple $g,h,k\in G$, we have the equality $i_{h,k} i_{g,hk}=i_{g,h}i_{gh,k}$ of isomorphisms $F_{ghk} \rightarrow F_g\circ F_h \circ F_k$.

Question 1: How does one define the quotient category $\mathcal{C}/G$?

Presumably, giving an action of $G$ on $\mathcal{C}$ in the above sense is equivalent to giving a pseudo-functor $BG\rightarrow \mathbf{Cat}$ where $BG$ denotes the one object groupoid corresponding to $G$ and $\mathbf{Cat}$ denotes the 2-category of all small categories. Therefore, the quotient I am asking about should be the (pseudo) 2-colimit of this functor. There are general constructions of 2-limits discussed for example, here: http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/2-limit. I guess my question boils down to this: how does one make this 2-colimit explicit in the case at hand?

Note that if the functors $F_g$ are automorphisms, then this question is discussed here Quotient of a category by a group action. However, it seems like the references mentioned there do not discuss the more general case considered in this post. A related question is this:

Question 2: Suppose $\mathcal{C}$ is an abelian (resp. dg) category equipped with an action of $G$ in the above sense, but now we assume that the functors $F_g$'s are exact (resp. dg). How does one define $\mathcal{C}/G$ as an abelian (resp. dg) category?

Remark: Here are the "classical" analogues of these questions. If $G$ acts on a set $S$, then we have the quotient set $S/G$. If $G$ acts on a vector space $V$, then the quotient space is simply the coinvariants $V_G$ of the action. In both cases, this is the colimit of the functor $BG\rightarrow \mathbf{Sets}$ (resp. $BG\rightarrow \mathbf{Vect}$), but to work with these quotients, one needs an explicit description of this colimit. Of course, we have the explicit descriptions in these classical cases.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps via an 'action 2-category' - this could be seen as a sort of weak quotient. If you want a category out of this, take isomorphism classes of 1-arrows in this 2-category. $\endgroup$ – David Roberts Oct 15 '13 at 0:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But see also mathoverflow.net/questions/22686/… $\endgroup$ – David Roberts Oct 15 '13 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ Taking isomorphisms classes of 1-arrows in the action 2-category does indeed seem reasonable. I wonder if there is a reference where this is done and where it is checked that this indeed does give the colimit of the functor $BG\rightarrow \mathbf{Cat}$. $\endgroup$ – Dr. Evil Oct 15 '13 at 0:52
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not aware of one, but that's not to say it hasn't been done (e.g. in SGA or similar) $\endgroup$ – David Roberts Oct 15 '13 at 1:25
  • $\begingroup$ I doubt that there will be a nice description, although it is clear what the quotient should "do", namely it should add isomorphisms $x \cong F_g(x)$ to our category. How does this work for preorders? $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Oct 15 '13 at 8:25

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.