It is conjectured that a divisor on $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ would be ample if $D\cdot C >0$ for all F-curves $C\subset \overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$. Does the intersection degree with all F-curves identify completely a divisor $D$? I.e.: if $D$ and $D'$ have the same degree once restricted to any F-curve, do we have $\mathcal{O}(D)\cong \mathcal{O}(D')$?


1 Answer 1


Yes, this is true.

First of all, the map $\newcommand{\MM}{\mathcal{\overline M}_{g,n}}A^1(\MM) \to H^2(\MM)$ is an isomorphism (say with $\mathbf Q$-coefficients on both sides), so by Poincaré duality it will be enough to prove that $H^{6g-6+2n-2}(\MM)$ is spanned by classes of F-curves.

We do this using the spectral sequence associated to a filtration. Filter $\MM$ by taking $X_k$ to be the union of all strata of dimension $\leq k$ in the stratification by topological type, so we have a chain of closed subvarieties $$ \emptyset = X_{-1} \subset X_0 \subset \cdots \subset X_{3g-3+n} = \MM.$$ I always find it easier to think about the Poincaré dual spectral sequence in compactly supported cohomology, which reads $$ E_1^{pq} = H^{p+q}_c(X_p \setminus X_{p-1} ) \implies H^{p+q}_c(\MM).$$ Each $X_p \setminus X_{p-1}$ is a disjoint union of strata, each of the form $\prod \mathcal M_{g',n'}$ (possibly divided by a finite group). We want to show that $H^2_c(\MM)$ is spanned by F-curves. Now $H^2_c(X_0)$ obviously vanishes. $H^2_c(X_1 \setminus X_0)$ is given by the fundamental classes of all 1-dimensional strata. These are by definition the F-curves. For the 2-dimensional strata we have $H^2_c(\mathcal M_{0,5}) \neq 0$ and $H^2_c(\mathcal M_{0,4}\times \mathcal M_{0,4}) \neq 0$, but their Hodge structures are not pure (see here) so these classes can't survive to $E_\infty$ (because the cohomology of $\MM$ has a pure Hodge structure). It's easy to check that $H^2_c$ vanishes for all other 2-dimensional strata. Finally I claim that also $H^2_c(X_k \setminus X_{k-1})$ vanishes for all $k > 2$. This is (for instance) an easy consequence of the virtual cohomological dimension of $\mathcal M_{g,n}$ (see here).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.