Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field. I'm interested in isomorphism classes of triples $(V,f,g)$ where $V$ is a finite dimensional $K$-vector space and $f,g$ are commuting endomorphisms of $V$. What I expect is a "normal form" theorem, similar to Jordan's one - which solves the case of a single endomorphism.

If we can find some smooth irreducible curve $\, \mathcal{C} \, : \, P(x,y) = 0$ defined over $K$ such that $P(f,g) = 0$, then the $K[X,Y]$-module structure on $V$ factors through the coordinate ring of $\mathcal{C}$, which is a Dedekind domain. One can then apply the "structure theorem for finitely generated modules over Dedekind domains", which yields : $(V,f,g)$ has a (essentially unique) direct sum decomposition into triples of the form $(K[X,Y]/(X,Y)^n,\alpha + X, \beta + Y)$, where $n \geq 1$ and $(\alpha,\beta)$ is some point of $\mathcal{C}$.

Is there a similar result in absence of such a nice curve ? (This question was raised in the comments of this mathstackexchange question.)

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In general, there is no such structure theorems. But, this is a well studied case and one can at least say that there is a flat deformation with general member having the property you mention. This fails spectacularly if you take more commuting endomorphisms. $\endgroup$ – Mohan Aug 29 '13 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Could you give references for these facts ? (or at least indicate what are the relevant keywords) $\endgroup$ – js21 Aug 29 '13 at 18:56

The classification of $K[X,Y]$-modules of finite length is of wild type, meaning that a classification of these modules would contain within it a classification of all finite-dimensional $\Lambda$-modules for all finite-dimensional $K$-algebras $\Lambda$. This is a theorem of Gelfand-Ponomarev.

In fact, even the classification of those $K[X,Y]$-modules annihilated by $(X^2, XY^2,Y^3)$ is a wild problem, as shown by Drozd.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. (Note, however, that it doesn't exclude the existence of such a classification theorem ...!) Do you have a concrete example of such a module which does not decompose as in my question ? $\endgroup$ – js21 Aug 29 '13 at 19:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Actually it also contains the finite dimensional rep theory for all finitely generated K-algebras and the first order theory for the fd K[x,y]-algebras is undecidable. $\endgroup$ – Benjamin Steinberg Aug 30 '13 at 0:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.