Consider a smooth projective variety $X$ over $\mathbb{C}$ such that $X$ has models over $\mathbb{Z}[1/N]$ and $X_p=X_{\mathbb{Z}[1/N]}\times \text{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p)$ is also a smooth projective variety.

Now let $L$ be a line bundle over $X_{\mathbb{Z}[1/N]}$ and $L_\mathbb{C}$ and $L_p$ be the corresponding line bundle over $X=X_{\mathbb{Z}[1/N]}\times\text{Spec}(\mathbb{C})$ and $X_p$ respectively.

How do the properties of $L_\mathbb{C}$ (ample, nef, big, effective) relate to the properties of $L_p$?

For example, if $L_\mathbb{C}$ is nef does this imply that $L_p$ is nef?

Any references or starting points would be greatly appreciated.


No, that is not true: the property of being nef, ample, etc. is not stable under specialization (although it is stable under generization). For instance, begin with $Y=\mathbb{P}^2_{\mathbb{Z}}$, i.e., $\text{Proj} \ \mathbb{Z}[s,t,u]$ together with its natural projection $$\pi:Y\to \text{Spec}\ \mathbb{Z}.$$ Consider the homogeneous ideal $$I = \langle st(t-s),s(u-pt),t(u-ps),u(t-s),u(u-ps) \rangle.$$ The corresponding zero scheme is the union of three disjoint sections of $\pi$, namely $[1,0,0]$, $[0,1,0]$ and $[1,1,p]$. Let $\nu:X\to Y$ be the blowing up of $Y$ along $I$.

There is a canonically defined pullback map of invertible sheaves, $$f:\nu^*\omega_{Y/\mathbb{Z}} \to \omega_{X/\mathbb{Z}},$$ which identifies $\nu^*\omega_{Y/\mathbb{Z}}$ with $\omega_{X/\mathbb{Z}}(-\underline{E})$ for a unique Cartier divisor $\underline{E}$ on $X$, the exceptional divisor of $\nu$. Now consider the invertible sheaf $L = (\nu^*\mathcal{O}_Y(2))(-\underline{E})$.

Over $\mathbb{Z}[1/p]$, the invertible sheaf $L$ is nef, and even globally generated. Essentially this is because the associated ideal $I[1/p]$ is generated by the homogeneous generators of degree $2$; indeed, the one cubic generator $st(t-s)$ is already in the ideal generated by the quadratic generators, $$st(t-s) = \frac{1}{p}\left(s[t(u-ps)]-t[s(u-pt)]\right).$$ However, in characteristic $p$ this is not nef: the strict transform of the line $Z(u)$ has intersection number $-1$ with $L$.

Edit. Replace "openness" claim by "stable under generization", see comments below.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure quite what you mean by your parenthetical remark in the first line, but nefness is not an open property--see e.g. math.mit.edu/~johnl/docs/bminus.pdf $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '13 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ I should remark, the example I linked to is for an $\mathbb{R}$-divisor (theorem 1.2); I don't know of an honest example for a Cartier divisor, but I don't see why nefness should be open in that case either. $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '13 at 16:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Daniel: "Open" should be "stable under generization". Let $(X_R,\mathcal{O}(1))$ be a projective, flat $R$-scheme, where $R$ is a DVR. Let $\mathcal{L}_R$ be an invertible sheaf on $X_R$. Assume that $\mathcal{L}_0$ is nef on the closed fiber $X_0$. Then for every positive integer $N$, $\mathcal{L}_0^{\otimes N}(1)$ is ample on $X_0$ by Kleiman's criterion. Thus, by openness of ampleness, $\mathcal{L}_R^{\otimes N}(1)$ is ample for every positive integer $N$. Thus, $\mathcal{L}_R$ is nef. $\endgroup$ Aug 15 '13 at 19:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.