Peu or très ramifiée extension Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $\mathbb{F}$ be a finite extension of $\mathbb{F}_p$. Let $\omega$ be the mod $p$ cyclotomic character and let $V$ be a representation of $G_{p} = Gal(\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_p / \mathbb{Q}_p)$ over $\mathbb{F}$ which is a non-split extension of $\omega$ by $\omega$, namely we have a short exact sequence $1 \to \omega \to V \to \omega \to 1$.
We have a map $H^1 (G_p, V) \to H^1 (G_p, \omega)$ whose image is easily seen to be one dimensional over $\mathbb{F}$. Is it possible to describe it in terms of peu ramifiée or très ramifié extension ?
[EDIT] In order to be more precise, let me recall the definition of a peu ramifiée or très ramifiée extension in $H^1(G_p, \omega)$. (Those notions were introduced by Serre in Propriétés galoisiennes des points d'ordre fini des courbes elliptiques)
We have $H^1(G_p, \omega) \simeq \mathbb{Q}_p^{\times} / (\mathbb{Q}_p^{\times})^p \otimes_{\mathbb{F}_p} \mathbb{F}$ and the peu ramifiées extensions are the elements of the line $\mathbb{Z}_p^{\times} / (\mathbb{Z}_p^{\times})^p \otimes_{\mathbb{F}_p} \mathbb{F}$ and the très ramifiées ones are the complement of this set.
 A: I think I have the answer to the question.
By exactness, the image of $H^1(G_p, V) \to H^1(G_p, \omega)$ is the kernel of the cobord map $\delta : H^1(G_p, \omega) \to H^2(G_p, \omega)$.
As $V$ is a non split extension of $\omega$ by $\omega$, it defines a non zero element of $H^1(G_p, \mathbb{F})$, i.e. an additive character of $G_p$. Name this character $u$. Let $\eta$ be an element of $H^1(G_p, \omega)$. A direct computation (involving the definition of the map $\delta$) shows that $\delta(\eta) = u \cup \eta$ (the cup product of $u \in H^1(G_p, \mathbb{F})$ with $\eta \in H^1(G_p, \omega)$).
Now local class field theory tells us that this cup product $\cup : H^1(G_p, \mathbb{F}) \times H^1(G_p, \omega) \to H^2(G_p, \omega)$ is a perfect pairing and that the orthogonal of the line of unramified characters in $H^1(G_p, \mathbb{F})$ under this pairing is the line of peu ramifiées extensions.
Hence, if $V$ is defined (as an extension of $\omega$ by $\omega$) by an unramified character, the image of $H^1(G_p,V) \to H^1(G_p, \omega)$ consists of the peu ramifiées extensions whereas if $V$ is defined by a ramified character, then the image of $H^1(G_p, V) \to H^1(G_p, \omega)$ is generated by a très ramifiée extension.
A: Let me just clarify the distinction between peu ramifiée and très ramifiée extensions of a local field $K$ with finite residue field of characteristic $p$.  The reason for doing so is that I don't think $\mathbf{Q}_p$ ($p\neq2$) has any très ramifiées extensions, so it is not clear what the question is asking.  
The distinction applies to cyclic extensions $L$ of $K$ of degree $p$.  Let $t$ be the unique break in the ramification filtration on $\mathrm{Gal}(L|K)$ (as explained in my comments above).  It can be shown that if $p\mid t$, then $K$ is a finite extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ containing a primitive $p$-th root of $1$ and $L=K(\root p\of\pi)$ for some uniformiser $\pi$ of $K$.  If so, $L$ is called très ramifiée; otherwise (when $t$ is not divisible by $p$), $L$ is called peu ramifiée. 
The only case when $K=\mathbf{Q}_p$ contains a primitive $p$-th root of $1$ is when $p=2$, so the local fields $\mathbf{Q}_p$ have no très ramifiées extensions when $p\neq2$.  In light of this, one should clarify what is being asked in the question.
