I am reading a paper ( Kawamata, Y.; Namikawa, Y. Logarithmic deformations of normal crossing varieties and smoothing of degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties. Invent. math. 1994, 118, 395–409.) I have a question about some affirmations:

Definition A normal crossing variety is a reduced complex analytic space which is locally isomorphic to a normal crossing divisor on a smooth variety. It is called simple normal crossing variety if the irreducible components are smooth.

Friedman defined the concept of d-semistability for simple normal crossing varieties.

Then we have this note:

Note In general, a simple normal crossing variety $X$ admits a logarithmic structure $\mathcal U$ if and only if it is $d$-semistable.

My question is: Is not true that for every normal crossing divisor we can define a logarithmic structure? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_structure) Then to a simple normal crossing variety $X$ we can give always a logarithmic structure right? (or only locally?) Then how come we have a characterization in terms of d-semistability? What I am missing?


1 Answer 1


It is true that if $X\subseteq Y$ is a normal crossings divisor, then $Y$ has a log structure whose sheaf of monoids is the sheaf of regular functions invertible outside of $X$. It is also true that this log structure can then be restricted to $X$, giving a log structure on $X$.

On the other hand, if we start with $X$ a normal crossings variety, we do not get a log structure on it by this construction. Indeed, we are not presented with $X$ as a normal crossings divisor inside a smooth variety $Y$. If, however, there is a variety $Y$ with a normal crossings morphism $\pi:Y\rightarrow S$, with $S$ a smooth dimension $1$ variety and $X$ a fibre of $\pi$, then $X$ does have a log structure by the above construction. This is exactly the log structure that Kawamata and Namikawa construct. Indeed, the condition of $d$-stability is necessary for there to exist such a $Y$.

In fact, $d$-semistability implies more than the existence of a log structure on $X$, as there are many non-$d$-semistable $X$ which carry log structures (e.g., any normal crossings $X\subseteq Y$ for $Y$ an arbitrary smooth variety). More importantly, $d$-semistability implies $X$ is log smooth over the standard log point, $Spec\, k$ with the monoid $k^* \times{\mathbb N}$. I don't have Kawamata and Namikawa's article in front of me, but if I recall they did not use the most recent language for log structures. The complete statement should be:

$X$ is $d$-semistable if and only if there is a log structure on $X$ along with a log morphism to the standard log point which is log smooth.

You can see a more precise discussion in Fumiharu Kato's paper "Log smooth deformation theory." In particular, the statement is Theorem 11.2 in the version on the arxiv.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.