A translation surface is a Riemann surface equipped with a holomorphic 1-form $\omega$ and a Riemannian metric $g=\omega \bar \omega$ with conical singularities. It is well-known that there exists closed regular geodesics, i.e., those not going through singular points, but usually shortest curves in a given homotopy class pass through the singular points.

Question 1: Is the first homology group generated by regular closed geodesics (at least over $\mathbb Q$)? I am mainly interested in the case of genus $5$ surfaces with $\omega$ having four distinct double zeros.

Question 2: If question 1 has a negative answer, I would like to know if there is another way to determine the periods of $\omega$ in terms of the lengths of the regular closed geodesics $\gamma$ and their angles (defined by the (constant) modulus of $\omega(\gamma')$).


The answer to your Question 1 is no in general. In fact, there are two examples of square-tiled surfaces in genera 3 and 4 (sometimes called "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" and "Ornithorynque") with the following properties: each of them decomposes completely into two homologous cylinders in all directions and the Veech group is $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$. These properties imply that the $\mathbb{Q}$-span of the regular closed geodesics (core curves of cylinders in periodic directions) is 2-dimensional (generated by the horizontal and vertical regular closed geodesics). You can find more details about these two examples in this paper here http://w3.impa.br/%7Ecmateus/files/matheus-yoccoz1.pdf (for instance).

On the other hand, it is not known whether "similar" ("Shimura-Teichmuller") examples can exist in genus 5, but Martin Moller showed here http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0501333v2.pdf that they do not appear for genus $\geq 6$.

In a similar vein, I think these two examples also answer your Question 2: if I'm not mistaken, it is not possible to recover the periods of these examples only from the knowledge of the periods of regular closed geodesics.



  • $\begingroup$ Dear Matheus, somehow, I have not realized that my question was answered until now. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Apr 30 '15 at 8:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.