9
$\begingroup$

The two examples I have in mind are curves and abelian varieties. To be precise, if $C$ is a smooth projective algebraic curve over a number field $K$, then, for a prime $l$

$H^1_{et}(C_{\bar{K}},\mathbb{Q}_l)\cong T_l(J(C))\otimes\mathbb{Q}_l,$

where $J(C)$ is the Jacobian of $C$. The isomorphism is as $G_K$-modules, where $G_K$ is the absolute Galois group of $K$. A similar statement is true for abelian varieties.

What about smooth projective varieties of dimension $d$? Is there some generalization of the Jacobian with Tate module dual to the first etale cohomology group? When applied to an abelian variety, does this construction return the original abelian variety?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Yes, the generalized Jacobian is the Picard scheme and the result is basic Kummer theory, i.e. long cohomology exact sequences associated to the short exact sequences $0\to \mu_{\ell^n} \to \mathbb{G}_m \to \mathbb{G}_m \to 0$ of etale sheaves on $X$, together with the isomorphism $H^1_{et}(X, \mathbb{G}_m) = H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X^\ast) = Pic(X)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 3, 2013 at 14:09
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Ah, I should have been able to guess this might be the case. It would be very useful to me to know a reference covering the details, do you know one? $\endgroup$
    – Tom163
    Commented Jul 4, 2013 at 11:15
  • $\begingroup$ We need also a duality between $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mathbb{Z}/l^{n})$ and $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mu_{l^{n}})$. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 8, 2016 at 22:51

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

You have an exact sequence of sheaves for the étale topology:

$0\rightarrow \mu_{l^{n}} \rightarrow \mathbb{G}_m \rightarrow \mathbb{G}_m \rightarrow 0$.

If you take an injective resolution of this complex, you can see immediately that the p^power commute the diagramme in the first arrow of this complex.

By applying global section and the fact that we are in characteristic 0:

we have a short exact sequence of etale group cohomology: $0\rightarrow H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mu_{l^{n}})\rightarrow H^{1}_{et}(X_{\overline{K}}, \mathbb{G}_m) \rightarrow H^{1}_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mathbb{G}_m) \rightarrow 0$. Wa have also a duality between $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mu_{l^{n}})$ and $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mathbb{Z}/l^{n})$, and it is easy to see using complex Cech that $H^{1}_{et}(X_{\overline{K}}, \mathbb{G}_m)$ is the picard group and $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mu_{l^{n}})$ classifies the invertible sheaf with trivialisation of its $l^{n}$ tensor power. Thus, by taking the projective limits over $n$ you find that $H^1_{et}(X_{\overline{K}},\mathbb{Z}_p)$ is the dual of the tate module of the Picard scheme of $X$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .