3
$\begingroup$

Let $L/k$ be a field extension of algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero. Let $U$ be a smooth quasi-projective variety over $k$.

I am trying to understand why the base-change functor from $k$ to $L$ from

  1. the category of finite etale $k$-morphisms to $U$

to

  1. the category of finite etale $L$-morphisms to $U_L$

is faithful.

I have the feeling it is almost "trivial" and that there is a much more general statement concerning the base-change functor.

Does this appear anywhere, or could anybody provide some explanation?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Just out of curiosity: in which context are you interested in a (nontrivial) extention of an algebraically closed field which is itself algebraically closed? $\endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    Jun 17, 2013 at 14:36
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ An important example is $\mathbb{C}$ over $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ (links between number theory and complex geometry). $\endgroup$ Jun 17, 2013 at 14:40

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Let $L/k$ be a field extension. Then the base change functor $\mathsf{Sch}/k \to \mathsf{Sch}/L$ is faithful, i.e. if $f,g : X \to Y$ are morphisms of $k$-schemes with $f_L = g_L : X_L \to Y_L$, then $f=g$.

Proof: Choose an open affine covering of $Y$, pull it back to $X$ via $f$ and $g$ and take an affine refinement of the two affine coverings of $X$. This shows that we may assume that $X,Y$ are affine. But if $\alpha,\beta : A \to B$ are homomorphisms of $k$-algebras with $\alpha \otimes L = \beta \otimes L : A \otimes_k L \to B \otimes_k L$, then of course $\alpha=\beta $ since $B \to B \otimes_k L$ is injective. $\square$

Actually much more is true. See for example Grothendieck's exposé on descent theory in FGA or Vistoli's notes on descent theory.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.