Let $k$ be a field and $A$ be a finitely generated (commutative) algebra over $k$. If $A_1$ and $A_2$ are finitely generated $k$-subalgebras of $A$, is it true that $A_1 \cap A_2$ is also finitely generated (as an algebra) over $k$? What if $A$ is a polynomial ring?

Update (for the sake of completeness, April 1, 2017): This paper (disclaimer: it's mine) describes the smallest dimensional counterexample to the second question in zero characteristic. In positive characteristic the answer seems to be unknown.

  • I think you can prove this using some version of Steinitz exchange. – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 29 '10 at 5:03
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Thomas Bayer has found a counter-example using rings of invariants inside polynomial rings.

  • I am choosing this as an answer because it answers both questions simultaneously. It seems that Bayer's example requires the dimension of the polynomial ring to be at least 10. I wonder what happens in lower dimensions! – auniket Jan 29 '10 at 22:23

It is enough to show that the intersection of two finitely generated semigroups inside a finitely generated commutative semigroup is not necessarily finitely generated, for then you can consider the semigroup algebras.

So let $A$ be freely generated by $\{y,z\}\cup\{x_n:n\geq1\}$ subject to the relations $yx_n=x_{n+1}$ and $zx_n=x_{n+1}$ for all $n\geq 1$, and $x_nx_m=x_{nm}$ for all $n,m\geq1$ (notice that $A$ in fact coincides with the given set of generators...). Let $A_1$ be the subsemigroup generated by $y$ and $x_1$, and let $A_2$ be the subsemigroup generated by $z$ and $x_1$. Then $A$, $A_1$ and $A_2$ are finitely generated and commutative, yet the intersection $A_1\cap A_2$ is the subsemigroup of $A$ generated by $\{x_n:n\geq1\}$, which is isomorphic to $\mathbb N$ under the product. This is not finitely generated.

Later: Yemon asks in a comment if one can change this so that the containing algebra is a domain. I think this works: let $A$ be the algebra generated by $\{y,z,u\}\cup\{x_n:n\geq2\}$ subject to the relations $yx_n=x_{n+1}$ and $zx_n=x_{n+1}+u$ for all $n\geq 2$, and $x_nx_m=x_{nm}$ for all $n,m\geq1$, let $A_1$ be generated by $y$ and $x_2$, and let $A_2$ be generated by $z$, $u$ and $x_2$. (I have to remove $x_1$ for otherwise $x_1(x_1-1)=0$)

  • Of course, the algebra generated by A has an element y-z which annhilates a large part of the algebra... out of curiosity, is there a way to modify your example so as to get an integral domain for the containing algebra? – Yemon Choi Jan 29 '10 at 8:33
  • The modified example is not a domain either! It satisfies u = yu. In any case, thanks for the simple example. – auniket Jan 29 '10 at 22:04
  • The parethentical remark "notice that $A$ in fact coincides with the given set of generators" appears to be wrong: for example, $y^2$ and $yz$ are elements of $A$ that are not in the given set of generators. And in fact the whole example is a bit odd: expanding $yx_nx_m$ in two different ways (associativity!), we get $$(yx_n)x_m=x_{n+1}x_m=x_{(n+1)m}=x_{nm+m},$$ while $$y(x_n x_m)=yx_{nm}=x_{nm+1},$$ so $x_{nm+m}=x_{nm+1}$ for all $n,m$. – Victor Protsak Apr 2 '17 at 5:45
  • (Cont'd) Setting $n=1, m=2$, it follows that $x_3=x_4$, hence $x_4=yx_3=yx_4=x_5$, etc, and the whole thing collapses from there. – Victor Protsak Apr 2 '17 at 5:53
  • I have posted a modification of your example that does work as an answer. – Victor Protsak Apr 2 '17 at 22:02

Here is a variant of Mariano's construction that answers the question. We shall construct a commutative semigroup $S$ and its subsemigroups $S_1,S_2$ such that

(*) $S,S_1,S_2$ are finitely generated, but $S_1\cap S_2$ is not.

Then passing to the semigroup algebras $A=k[S]$, $A_1=k[S_1]$, $A_2=k[S_2]$, which satisfy $A_1\cap A_2=k[S_1\cap S_2]$ and have the same finite generation properties as the corresponding semigroups, would yield a counterexample to the question.

Let $T$ be the commutative subsemigroup of $\Bbb{Z}^2$ generated by $x_i=(i,1)$ for $i\geq 0$. Thus $$T=\{(a,b)\in\Bbb{Z}^2: a\geq 0, b\ge 1 \text{ or } a=b=0\}$$ consists of the integer points in the semiopen real cone $\{(a,b)\in \Bbb{R}^2: a\geq 0, b>0\}$ together with the origin. It is easy to see that $T$ is not f.g. Let $S$ be formed by adjoining commuting elements $y,z$ to $T$ subject to the relations $yx_i=x_iy=x_{i+1}$ and $z x_i=x_i z=x_{i+1}$. Set $S_1=\langle T,y\rangle$ and $S_2=\langle T,z\rangle$. Clearly, $S_1$ is generated by $x_0$ and $y$, $S_2$ is generated by $x_0$ and $z$ and $S$ is generated by $x_0, y$ and $z$. Moreover, $S_1\cap S_2=T$ is not f.g., meaning (*) holds.

Where does this come from? First, $T$ is the standard example of a non-f.g. commutative semigroup embedded into an f.g. one. In fact, both $S_1$ and $S_2$ are naturally isomorphic to $\Bbb{Z}_{+}^2$, with $y$, resp. $z$, corresponding to $(1,0)$, and $S$ is the amalgamated product of $S_1$ and $S_2$ over $T$ in the category of commutative semigroups. However, I do not see how to modify this construction to make $S$ an affine semigroup (so that $A=k[S]$ is a domain). In particular, it appears impossible to get a counterexample with $A$ a polynomial ring in this fashion.

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.