Let $X$ and $Y$ be compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$. Assume that $X \sqcup X \cong Y \sqcup Y$ (here $X \sqcup X$ is the disjoint union of two copies of $X$, considered as a topological space, and similarly for $Y \sqcup Y$). Then I'm pretty sure that we must have $X \cong Y$. This clearly holds if $X$ and $Y$ are connected, but I can't seem to prove it in general. Can anyone help me?

$\begingroup$ I don't see a proof. I do see a counterexample which involves four copies of [0,1) , but that is not compact. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2013.06.08 $\endgroup$– Gerhard PasemanJun 8, 2013 at 17:18

$\begingroup$ Scratch that. My counterexample is not, and I am unsure that it could be massaged into one. Gerhard "Back To Your Regular Programming" Paseman, 2013.06.08 $\endgroup$– Gerhard PasemanJun 8, 2013 at 18:31

3$\begingroup$ If only you hadn't required the spaces to live in $\mathbb R^n$, I could simply cite my answer to an earlier question: mathoverflow.net/questions/26414 . But with the restriction to subsets of $\mathbb R^n$, all I can say is "interesting question". $\endgroup$– Andreas BlassJun 8, 2013 at 19:49

1$\begingroup$ @Andreas Blass : Yes, I was aware that there were counterexamples if you allowed sufficiently weird spaces (the sorts of spaces that show up in my nightmares; I try not to think about them). $\endgroup$– SamJun 9, 2013 at 1:25

1$\begingroup$ Since one of the spaces that Andy Putman referred to has a lot of legs and shows up in nightmares I think it is safe to call this space a monster! $\endgroup$– Joseph Van NameJun 13, 2013 at 11:43
1 Answer
The result you want is false. Counterexamples are given in
Yamamoto, Shuji and Yamashita, Atsushi, A counterexample related to topological sums. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134 (2006), no. 12, 3715–3719.
These counterexamples are compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}^4$.

3$\begingroup$ The authors also mention that one can modify their construction to obtain an example in $\mathbb R^2$. $\endgroup$ Jun 13, 2013 at 7:40

