5
$\begingroup$

A subfactor $N \subset M$ is maximal if it admits no non-trivial intermediate subfactors $N \subset P \subset M$.

Is there an infinite depth irreducible finite index maximal subfactor (other than Temperley-Lieb $A_{\infty} $) ?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

The infinite depth subfactor coming from SU(3) at any index above 9 gives an example. Here the Q-system is $V_{(1,0)} \otimes V_{(0,1)} \cong V_{(1,1)} \oplus V_{(0,0)}$ so the only possible sub-objects are the whole thing or the trivial, so it's certainly maximal.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thank you. Maybe there are such examples for every simple Lie groups... $\endgroup$ – Sebastien Palcoux Jun 5 '13 at 22:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In general it'd probably be a bit tricky to work out whether the subfactor is maximal. But for SU(n) the same argument should work. $\endgroup$ – Noah Snyder Jun 5 '13 at 22:47
  • $\begingroup$ In my opinion, it would be a nice work to exhibit every infinite depth irreducible finite index maximal subfactors coming from the simple Lie groups. $\endgroup$ – Sebastien Palcoux Jun 12 '13 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.