Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space equipped with a probability measure $\mu$ (defined on the Borel $\sigma$-algebra on the topology induced by the metric $d$). I am interested in the different values that the following can take

$\sup\lbrace\mu(A):A\subset X\text{ is measurable and }\mu(A)\leq1/2\rbrace~~~~~~~~~~(\ast)$.

If there exists a measurable set $A\subset X$ such that $\mu(A)=1/2$, then it clearly is the case that $(\ast)$ is $1/2$.

If there is no set of measure $1/2$, then it is possible for $(\ast)$ to be different than $1/2$ (Dirac probability measure comes to mind). What I am wondering is if it could still be $1/2$.

In other words, I'm wondering if we could prove the existence (ideally with an example) or the nonexistence of a probability measure on a metric space $(X,d)$ such that for every measurable $A\subset X$, $\mu(A)\neq1/2$ and such that there is a sequence $\lbrace A_n\rbrace$ where $\mu(A_n)\to1/2$.

A few obvious remarks, if we were to find a probability measure as described in the above paragraph, the sequence $A_n$ cannot be nested, otherwise continuity from above or continuity from below would imply that the union or the intersection of the $A_n$ has a measure of $1/2$. Furthermore, the $A_n$ cannot be pairwise disjoint, otherwise $\mu$ cannot be a probability measure: for all $\epsilon>0$, infinitely many of the $A_n$ are contained in $(1/2-\epsilon,1/2+\epsilon)$, which implies by countable additivity that $\mu(X)\geq\infty$.


Short version: the set $\{\mu(B):B\in\mathcal{B}\}$ is a closed set for any probability space $(X,\mathcal{B},\mu)$. For atomic spaces this follows from an elementary topological argument, and for non-atomic spaces it is a closed interval by a classical (and easy) result of Sierpinski.

Longer version with details:

Let $A_n=A'_n\cup A''_n$ where $A'_n$ is the atomic part of $A_n$ and $A''_n$ is the rest. By passing to a subsequence we may assume that $\mu(A'_n)$ converges to some $\alpha\in [0,1/2]$.

I claim that there is an atomic set $B'$ such that $\mu(B')=\alpha$. Indeed, let $\{ x_k\}$ be the collection of the $\mu$-measures of all atoms of all $A'_n$.

The set $X=\{ \sum_{k\in I} x_k: I\subset \mathbb{N}\}$ can be checked to be closed, since it is the continuous image of the $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ under the map $I\to \sum_{k\in I} x_k$, where we identify sequences $\omega$ in $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ with the set $I=\{ j: \omega_j=1\}$. Since $\alpha$ is in the closure of $X$ (as $\mu(A'_n)\to\alpha$), $\alpha\in X$, as claimed.

Now the non-atomic part of the space has mass at least $1/2-\alpha$ (since it has mass at least $\mu(A''_n)$ for each $n$). But it is well known that if $\nu$ is a non-atomic measure of mass $c$, then for any $c'\in [0,c]$ there is a measurable set of $\nu$-mass $c'$ (see for example wikipedia). Applying this to $\nu$=restriction of $\mu$ to non-atomic part and $c'=1/2-\alpha$, we get a measurable non-atomic set $B''$ of $\mu$-measure $1/2-\alpha$.

Hence $B=B'\cup B''$ satifies $\mu(B)=1/2$.


Presuming your space is separable, the measure space $(X,\mu)$ is always Lebesgue, i.e., isomorphic to a disjoint union of an interval (with the Lebesgue measure on it) and an at most countable family of atoms.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy