3
$\begingroup$

I am unsure which is the right spelling (if there even is a ‘right’ spelling), but maybe native speakers can enlighten me: When should I use

  • fixed point
  • fixed-point
  • fixedpoint

when I refer to the point itself, but also in composite works (“fixed point equation”, “fixed-point juggling”, “fixed-point operator”)?

And do the same rules apply to prefixed points?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ When it is a phrasal adjective you use a hyphen. So when it modifies a noun uses a hyphen: fixed−point equation, fixed−point operator, fixed−point theory. But, on the other hand, take a fixed point of the operator, consider the fixed point in $X$. We have found our fixed point. When the phrasal adjective ends with -ly, drop the hyphen, the -ly is your separator. So perfectly separated set... Fixedpoint is ugly (never use it). $\endgroup$
    – Rabee Tourky
    May 22, 2013 at 9:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The underlying rule here is that you only need to hyphenate noun phrases that are being used adjectivally. Not doing so can lead to confusion - does the phrase 'fixed point theory' refer to a theory of fixed points or a fixed theory of points? $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    May 22, 2013 at 14:21

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
15
$\begingroup$

When it is a phrasal adjective you use a hyphen.

So when it modifies a noun uses a hyphen: fixed−point equation, fixed−point operator, fixed-point theory.

But, on the other hand, take a fixed point of the operator, consider the fixed point in X. We have found our fixed point.

When the phrasal adjective ends with -ly, drop the hyphen, the -ly is your separator. So perfectly separated set

... Fixedpoint is ugly (never use it).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
7
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Except that you should really do as you say and use a hyphen (fixed-point, U+002D, TeX: -), not a minus sign (fixed−point, U+2212, TeX: dollar-dollar). $\endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    May 22, 2013 at 11:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So the answer originally began as follows. If $(F_1,F_2)$ is an ordered pair modifying the noun $N$, then we write $F_1-F_2$ $N$. But then I thought that was being too cute, so I cut and pasted... $\endgroup$
    – Rabee Tourky
    May 22, 2013 at 13:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is exactly right. Even native speakers get it wrong all too often. $\endgroup$
    – Lubin
    May 22, 2013 at 13:19
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Lubin There's no such thing as right or wrong in language. If you feel native speakers get something "wrong" too often, it's either that a significant minority speaks/writes in a way you don't like or that it's your language use that is different from the norm. This is how descriptive grammar works. Of course, if you're talking about a specific "style," there is the right way. But then, whether the writer is a native speaker doesn't matter. Anyone can adopt any standard style. $\endgroup$
    – Yuichiro Fujiwara
    May 22, 2013 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ As noted above, this is very nearly correct but not quite. (Acknowledging Yuichiro's objections, let me modify that as follows: this advice will lead to unnecessary hyphenation in certain cases, and many writers regard hyphenation as ugly and to be used sparingly.) Ambiguity is only a problem when the adjectival phrase is a noun phrase; if it isn't, the hyphenation shouldn't be necessary. The '-ly' exception is trying to get at this, but is really just an ugly hack that doesn't quite get at the underlying point. 'Well tempered clavier' is a nice example. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    May 23, 2013 at 11:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.