0
$\begingroup$

This might be a very simple question, and that might be the reason that I could not find any reference on this.

My question is

Let $A$ be an abelian variety defined over a number field $k$, and $N$ the conductor. Let $m\geq 2$. Consider the division field $k(A[m])$. Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a prime ideal in $k$ that divides $m$. Also suppose that $k(A[m])\neq k$. Then is it true that $$\mathfrak{p} \textrm{ is ramified in } k(A[m]) ? $$

If this is not true, then can anyone provide a counterexample?

I know that if $\mathfrak{p}$ does not divide $mN$, then it should be unramified.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Counterexample: take an elliptic curve $y^2=x(x^2-d)$ with $d \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ over the rationals and $m=2$. $\endgroup$ – Felipe Voloch May 16 '13 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. This is also very clear. So $\mathbb{Q}(E[2])=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})$, and primes ramify in $\mathbb{Q}$ are precisely the prime divisors of $d$. $\endgroup$ – Sungjin Kim May 16 '13 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I should have put, $m$ avoids all primes of bad reduction. $\endgroup$ – Sungjin Kim May 16 '13 at 21:09
2
$\begingroup$

What if $m=pq$ with $\mathfrak p \mid p$ and $p\ne q$ and $k(A[p])=k$? Then the $p$-torsion doesn't cause ramification since its defined over $k$, and the $q$-torsion won't cause $\mathfrak p$ ramification (assuming $A$ has good reduction at the primes lying over $p$ and $q$).

It gets more interesting if you assume that $m$ is a power of $p$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for clear counterexample. I'd like to know what happens when $m$ is a power of $p$. $\endgroup$ – Sungjin Kim May 16 '13 at 20:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.