3
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are two smooth manifolds and '$ \Re$' be the reals with the normal manifold structure. And here I use '$=$' to mean diffeomorphism. Is the statement below true?

$ S \times \Re = T \times \Re \Rightarrow S = T$.

What if '$=$' meant homeomorphism?

What if $S$ and $T$ are compact?

PS: Bartnik's splitting theorem states that if a space-time has a COMPACT cauchy hypersurface and is geodesically complete and has non negative ricci curvature every where then it can be split isometrically as a 3-manifold with a riemannian metric and $ \Re$ with the metric $-d^2t$.

It has been shown that such space-times can be splitt smoothly, so if there is a unique splitting then one can reduce the problem to something like:

if such and such conditions hold can the section $s:S \times \Re \longrightarrow E(S) \oplus E(\Re)$ be written as $s1 \oplus s2$ where $s1: S \longrightarrow E(S)$ and $s2: \Re \longrightarrow E(\Re)$.

i know that it really won't get transfered to this exactly. for example $f(x,y)dx + g(x,y)dy$ can be written in the form $F(U)dU + g(V)dV$ iff $ \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial y } = \frac{\partial{g}}{\partial x }$.

(i know that this is a very crude reasoning. for example i don't know for sure whether to reduce the problem to this do i really need it to know whether there is more than 1 splitting or not. or on the other hand if i reduce it to the above, is that any kind of improvement at all or not)

(any opinion on my whole approach is more than welcome.)

that is how i came across this question.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Just to write out Ryan's answer: Let $S$ be the sphere with three closed disks removed. Let $T$ be the torus with one closed disk removed. Note that $T$ is non-planar. Thus $S$ is not homeomorphic to $T$. $\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}$ $\newcommand{\cross}{\times}$

On the other hand, let $S' = S \cross \RR$ and let $T' = T \cross \RR$. Then $S'$ and $T'$ are both diffeomorphic to the open, genus two handlebody. Thus $S'$ and $T'$ are diffeomorphic to each other.

I agree that this is homework, but it is good homework! What if $S$ and $T$ are required to be compact?

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ sorry if it looks like a homework. i really came across this when thinking about an open problem. I think this shows that I am weak at manifold theory a little bit. I think it is a good idea to add a post script and give some detail about the problem. $\endgroup$ – Ramin Asadi Mar 29 '13 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ now if you read the PS you'll notice that compactness is given so ... but if that is a homework too just tell me so, i'll try to figure it out myself. $\endgroup$ – Ramin Asadi Mar 29 '13 at 22:04
7
$\begingroup$

No. (Whitehead manifold) $\times \mathbb{R}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$. See Rolfsen's "Knots and Links", for example. There are uncountably many other examples in a similar vein.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Oops - I see Martin beat me to it by seconds. $\endgroup$ – Scott Taylor Mar 29 '13 at 18:00
  • $\begingroup$ No worries, I removed my comment :-) $\endgroup$ – Martin Mar 29 '13 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much. is what you say true for the diffeomorphism too? $\endgroup$ – Ramin Asadi Mar 29 '13 at 18:07
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ There's much simpler answers. You can take $S$ and $T$ to be 2-dimensional manifolds. But this is a standard homework problem. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Budney Mar 29 '13 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ for diffeomorphism case right???? that it what really matters $\endgroup$ – Ramin Asadi Mar 29 '13 at 20:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.