Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a (small) exact category. Without delving into any homotopy theory, we can provide characterisations of $K_0(\mathcal{P})$ and $K_1(\mathcal{P})$ as plain categorical constructions:

$K_0(\mathcal{P})$ is the free abelian group on the objects of $\mathcal{P}$ under the relations $[P] = [P'] + [P'']$ if $0 \to P' \to P \to P'' \to 0$

$K_1(\mathcal{P})$ is the free abelian group on the pairs $(P, \alpha)$, where $P$ is an object and $\alpha$ one of its automotphisms, under suitable relations.

Does $K_2(\mathcal{P})$ admit a similar description?

My question has been answered (and then some!). It has been pointed out however that I was slightly mistaken: the $K_1(\mathcal{P})$ given above only coincides with the standard one ($\pi_2(Q \mathcal{P})$) when short exact sequence of $\mathcal{P}$ splits. So I actually refer to the `Bass $K_1$'.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not expecting the answer to be a pretty one. $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2013 at 3:55
  • $\begingroup$ can I ask what the relations are for $K_1$? $\endgroup$
    – Jacob Bell
    Mar 21, 2013 at 4:00
  • $\begingroup$ Sure: $[(P,\alpha \beta)] = [(P,\alpha)] + [(P, \beta)]$, and $[(P,\alpha)] = [(P,\alpha_1)] + [(P,\alpha_2)]$, where $0 \to P' \to P \to P'' \to 0$, $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ are automorphisms of $P'$ and $P''$ such that the translation from one short exact sequence to the other gives a commutative diagram. (One can find this near the beginning of chapter 3 in Rosenberg's algebraic K-theory text.) $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2013 at 4:08

2 Answers 2


Algebraic generators and relations for Quillen's K-group $K_n(P)$ are given in this paper: "Algebraic K-theory via binary complexes". Those you mention don't give the Quillen K-group $K_1(P)$ in general, but just for Quillen-exact categories where every short exact sequence splits; the group they give is known as Bass' $K_1$.

  • $\begingroup$ @Dan: Thank you for the answer - and the paper. I will start making my way through it very soon. $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2013 at 12:50

The $K_1$ group you describe is the automorphism $K_1$, which is in general not isomorphic to Quillen's $K_1$ of an exact category. It coincides with Quillen's when exact sequences in $\mathcal P$ split. For a description by generators and relations of $K_1$ of any exact category see:

Nenashev, A. K1 by generators and relations. (English summary) J. Pure Appl. Algebra 131 (1998), no. 2, 195–212.

generators are pairs of short exact sequences on the same objects, and relations are given by $3\times 3$ diagrams. A generalization of this result to all $K_n$ is given in

Grayson, Daniel R. Algebraic K-theory via binary complexes. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), no. 4, 1149–1167.

  • $\begingroup$ So what about $K_2$? $\endgroup$ Mar 22, 2013 at 1:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.