1
$\begingroup$

I am probably making some very annoying mistake but for whatever it is worth let me ask it here.

Consider a hypersurface $S$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$. Let $\nu$ be the unit outward normal. Let $f:\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be defined as $f(p)=r^2$, where $r$ is the radial distance of $p$ to the origin. Let $z=f|_S$, $\sigma$ be the second fundamental tensor, and for an orthonormal local framefield $\{E_i\}$ let $h=\frac{1}{n}\sum\sigma(E_i,E_i)$. Then we have the following -

$\Delta z = 2n(1+\langle h,\vec{r}\rangle)$, This comes from the (possibly preprint) paper of Oscar Garay titled "application of reilly's formula"

Where $\Delta$ is defined as $\Delta g=-\textrm{Trace}(X\mapsto\nabla_X\textrm{grad}g)$

My problem is I am getting the wrong sign always ... I get $\Delta z = 2n(-1+\langle h,\vec{r}\rangle)$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What is the convention for the sign of the second fundamental form? Once you know that you can just do a simple sanity check by looking at the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^n$. If the sign convention is that for a sphere the mean curvature vector is outward pointing, then you are right (up to an overall minus sign outside the parentheses). (Since $z \equiv 1$ on $S$...) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2013 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ The convention is $\bar{\nabla} = \nabla + \sigma$ where $\bar{\nabla} $ is the connection on $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $\nabla$ is the connection on $S$ and $\sigma$ is the second fundamental tensor. The laplacian sign convention I have already described. I dont think it is a problem of sign convention. Any other opinions ? $\endgroup$
    – magguu
    Commented Mar 1, 2013 at 6:05

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.