4
$\begingroup$

For this question we will consider the Zariski site of affine schemes and a stack $\mathcal{M}$ over it. I don't know what a substack is, but I have a guess. The stack $\mathcal{M}$ has an underlying path-component sheaf $\pi_0\mathcal{M}$, and we have a map $\mathcal{M}\rightarrow \pi_0\mathcal{M}$. A stack $\mathcal{N}\rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ is substack if the induced map of sheaves $\pi_0\mathcal{N}\rightarrow\pi_0\mathcal{M}$ is an inclusion, and the resulting square is $2$-categorical pullback. I am not exactly sure this definition is right, but at least the notion is "homotopic". So my first question is:

$1$. Is this a definition of a substack?

I also have a guess of what a closed substack is supposed to be (of course, assuming that the definition of a substack is more or less what I wrote above). We can first define it for sheaves. A map of sheaves $F\rightarrow G$ is a closed immersion of sheaves, if any pullback along a map $\mathrm{Spec}(R)\rightarrow G$ is a map of form $\mathrm{Spec}(R/I)\rightarrow \mathrm{Spec}(R)$. For the case of stacks, we say $\mathcal{N}\rightarrow\mathcal{M}$ is a closed immersion if it is a substack, such that the induced map $\pi_0\mathcal{N}\rightarrow\pi_0\mathcal{M}$ is a closed immersion. My second question:

$2$. Is this the correct definition of a closed substack?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A substack $Y \subset X$ is a stack $Y$ equipped with a map to $X$ such that for every affine $A$, $Y(A) \to X(A)$ is the inclusion of a full, replete subcategory (replete: every object isomorphic to one in the image is in the image). At least for topological stacks, the property of a map being a closed embedding is local on the target and invariant under base change, so we can define a representable map of stacks to be closed if it is so locally. $\endgroup$ – David Roberts Feb 27 '13 at 23:25
3
$\begingroup$

No need to guess, just look it up. http://ens.math.univ-montp2.fr/~toen/cours8.pdf Definition 1.1.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Here is a definition in terms of presentation of the stack: Definition 1.5 in Angelo Vistoli's paper "Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and on their moduli spaces".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.