This is a reformulation of this MO question which recieved little or no attention due to the fact that the OP gave no motivation whatsoever. I found the question quite interesting and decided to give it another try (if this is not OK please let me know and I´ll delete this post).

It is known that if $G$ is an abelian compact topological group then it contains a dense subgroup $H$ which is countably tight (in fact Frechet-Urysohn). However the following is open (at least it was a few years ago):

If $G$ is a compact group, must $G$ contain a dense subspace of countable tightness?

This is problem 4.1.1 in "Topological Groups and Related Structures" by A.Arhangelskii and M.Thachenko. Problem 4.1.7 (also open) in the same book is:

Is it true that every homogeneous compact space contains a dense subspace of countable tightness?

My guess is that there should be known examples of (non-homogeneous) compact spaces such that any dense subspace has uncountable tightness, but I could not find any. So I have two questions:

1) Is there such a compact space?

2) For a cardinal $\kappa > 2^{\aleph_0}$ what is a dense subspace of $[0,1]^\kappa$ that has countable tightness?

Perhaps the answer to 2) is that there is none, and $[0,1]^\kappa$ is indeed a counterexample for the second quoted question, but I wouldn´t expect that. Note that if $\kappa \leq 2^{\aleph_0}$ then $[0,1]^\kappa$ is separable and any countable dense subspace would do the trick.

Edit: As Santi suggests in a comment to his answer of 2), the space $X=\beta\mathbb{N} \setminus \mathbb{N}$ is a good candidate for 1), but I still don´t know for sure. Some facts about $X$ that might be relevant: a) $X$ is compact, b) any dense subset of $X$ has size at least $2^{\aleph_0}$, c) the tightness of $X$ is $2^{\aleph_0}$, d) there are $R$-points in $X$, i.e. there exist an open $U \subseteq X$ and a point $x \in \overline{U}$ such that $x \notin \overline{A}$ for any $A \subseteq U$ with $|A|<2^{\aleph_0}$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note: $X$ is countably generated (= has countable tightness) if and only if the closure of any subset $A$ of $X$ equals the union of closures of all countable subsets of $A$. (from Wikipedia) $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Feb 26 '13 at 17:43

An $\eta_1$-set is a linearly ordered set $(Q, \leq)$ with the property that if A and B are countable subsets of $Q$ satisfying $a < b$ for all $a \in A, b \in B$, then there is an $x \in Q$ satisfying $a < x < b$ for all $a \in A, b \in B$. (This definition and the notation are from Gillman and Jerison.) Let $(X, \leq)$ be the Dedekind compactification of an $\eta_1$-set, that is, $X$ is constructed from the $\eta_1$-set $Q$ in analogy to the construction of the reals from the rationals using Dedekind cuts, and then a first and last element is added. Then $X$ is a connected compact space. I can't recall a reference, but $X$ is the disjoint union of three dense sets: the set of P-points (which includes the endpoints), the set of points that are limits of strictly increasing sequences, and the set of points that are limits of strictly decreasing sequences. Furthermore, in $X$ a point is a limit of a non-trivial sequence if and only if it is an accumulation point of a countable set. If $D$ is a dense subset containing a P-point, it obviously does not have countable tightness. If $D$ is a dense subset containing a limit $x$ of a strictly increasing sequence, then $x$ is not a limit of a strictly decreasing sequence, so the set $S$ of elements of $D$ larger than $x$ contains $x$ in its closure, but no countable subset of $S$ has $x$ in its closure. Similarly, a dense subset containing a limit of a strictly decreasing set does not have countable tightness.

  • $\begingroup$ I guess one can modify this example to get a compact space for which the tightness of any dense subspace is at least $\kappa$ (for any $\kappa$ given in advance). $\endgroup$ – Ramiro de la Vega Mar 21 '17 at 17:08

Ramiro, regarding 2), the set of all points in $I^\kappa$ with at most countably many non-zero coordinates is even Frechet-Urysohn, for every $\kappa$. This is due to Noble (see also exercise 3.10.D in Engelking).

Note: Frechet-Urysohn means that given a non-closed set $A$ and a point $x \in \overline{A} \setminus A $, there is a sequence inside $A$ converging to $x$.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi Santi! Great seeing you! $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Feb 26 '13 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ Great seeing you too, Asaf! Ramiro, what about \omega^*? Does it have a dense subset with countable tightness? $\endgroup$ – Santi Spadaro Feb 27 '13 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ Santi, \omega^* was my first guess too, but I don´t know how to prove it. $\endgroup$ – Ramiro de la Vega Feb 27 '13 at 20:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.