MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $X_i, \; i=1,2,3...,n$ are each Gaussian, then it is not in general true that the set is jointly Gaussian (a multivariate Gaussian).

Does a similar statement hold if the variates are pairwise Gaussian? i.e. if we have that $X_i, X_j$ are a bivariate Gaussian for all $i, j$, then it is not in general true that the set is jointly Gaussian. (And I suppose any dimensional variant of this? k-wise Gaussian => n-wise Gaussian)

If the statement holds, what is a simple low-dimensional example where you have a pairwise Gaussian system where this does not hold? Maybe this is in Counterexamples in Probability ... but I don't have this available right now.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $X_i$, $i=1\ldots3$, be iid standard normal random variables. Let $Y = |X_3|$ if $X_1 X_2 > 0$ and $-|X_3|$ if $X_1 X_2 \le 0$. Then $X_1, X_2, Y$ are normal and pairwise independent, but they are not jointly normal since $X_1 X_2 Y \ge 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Another, more general class of examples follows through the construction in "Families of m-Variate distributrions with given margins and m(m-1)/2 Bivariate dependence paramters" by H. Joe 96: The uniform and bivariate margins can be Gaussian, the higher level copulas can be arbitrary.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.