Let $F$ be a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$ and $G$ the group of rational points of an algebraic group defined over $F$, endowed with the natural topology. Any Zariski closed subgroup $H \subset G$ is $\text{exp } \mathfrak{h}$ for some subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of $G$, but what about subgroups which are closed in the $p$-adic topology? For instance, the compact open subgroups of $G$ are very important, and I wonder if such a subgroup arises by exponentiating a compact open subgroup of $\mathfrak{g}$ (i.e. an $\mathcal{O}_F$-lattice) closed under the Lie bracket. Is the situation better when $G$ is unipotent?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Your statement about exp's is false: p-adic exp has severe convergence problems even for GL$_n$. Read Serre's book "Lie groups and Lie algebras", in which he develops a good Lie correspondence over any non-archimedean field of characteristic 0 from scratch (and carries along the archimedean case, clarifying the special role of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ much as $\mathbf{R}$ has "better" features than $\mathbf{C}$ for a Lie correspondence, due to the density of $\mathbf{Q}$ in $\mathbf{R}$). Also see Bourbaki Lie Ch. III. You cannot expect to nail down exactly subgroups that are exp of their Lie algebra. $\endgroup$ – grp Sep 27 '12 at 21:27

Let $G$ be a $p$--adic Lie group. There is a 1:1 correspondence between $p$-adically closed subgroups up to finite index of $G$ and Lie subalgebras of its Lie algebra (which is a Lie algebra over $\mathbb Q_p$). The correspondence works just as in the classical setting. This is shown in a paper by Mattuck from the fifties, and in much greater generality in Lazard's thesis (beware, beware).

Attention: The image of a closed subgroup $H \subseteq G$ under the logarithm map is not always a $\mathbb Z_p$ submodule of the Lie algebra. Example: take $p=2$ and $H \subseteq \mathrm{GL}_3$ the unipotent radical of the Borel. Then $\mathrm{log}(H(\mathbb Z_p))$ is not stable under $+$.

You cannot hope for such a correspondence for strictly all closed subgroups. Although the exponential map is a homeomorphism locally around zero, it can in general not be extended to a surjective map. There is already a problem with $\mathbb Z_p^\ast$.

Also, this does not make much sense over extensions of $\mathbb Q_p$. If $F$ is some nontrivial finite extension of $\mathbb Q_p$, then $F$ viewed as a Lie group under addition has many closed subgroups (all the $\mathbb Q_p$-linear subspaces), but the Lie algebra (which is also $F$) has no proper $F$--linear subalgebra.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Concerning your final paragraph: things do make good sense over extensions $F$ of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ provided one replaces the purely topological viewpoint of "closed subgroups" with the more analytic viewpoint of "closed $F$-analytic subgroups" taken up to clopen subgroups (and Lie $F$-subalgebras of the ambient Lie algebra). This is discussed nicely in both Serre's book and Bourbaki. It is analogous to the fact that one has a good Lie correspondence over $\mathbf{C}$ but it requires going beyond the purely topological formulation that works well over $\mathbf{R}$. $\endgroup$ – grp Sep 28 '12 at 2:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.