MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top is probably a very trivial question, but I am a beginner in arithmetics.

share|cite|improve this question
I'm not sure how well-posed this questions is. A particular variety has points or it doesn't, so "the Hasse principle holds" is the sort of thing one says about a collection of varieties characterized in some way. For a particular such collection, it makes sense to ask if it is closed under birational isomorphism, but I'm not sure what the question in the title could mean precisely as stated... – Ramsey Sep 27 '12 at 17:51
I guess that the answer to my question is very likely to be NO. I assume that for the variety (say projective) A the Hasse principle holds. The projective variety B is birationally equivalent to A, does the Hasse principle hold for B? – IMeasy Sep 27 '12 at 17:57
I guess my point is that, for a fixed variety $A$, the statement that "the Hasse principle holds for $A$" has little meaning. This variety either has a rational point or it does not. – Ramsey Sep 27 '12 at 20:06
OK sorry. I see what you mean, I was being a little sloppy, you are right. Let's put it this way: say I have a class of varieties for which the principle holds: I pick up one V and find another variety W - not belonging to the same class- that is birationally equivalent to V. Do I expect W to belong to a second class of varieties for which the principle holds? – IMeasy Sep 27 '12 at 20:11
Saying that for a variety X over a global field k the HP holds does have meaning: saying HP holds for X means that the implication ``X has local points everywhere'' $\Rightarrow$ `X has a global point'' is true. The only way in which it could fail if X has local points everywhere but does NOT have a global point. In this way, HP can be said to hold or not hold for any set or class of varieties, including singleton sets. – René Sep 27 '12 at 21:14
up vote 18 down vote accepted

In this generality, the answer is no. The projective curve $X$ given by $2y^2z^2 = x^4 - 17z^4$ over the rationals satisfies the HP, since it has local points everywhere (the affine part $z \neq 0$ is given by $2y'^2=x'^4-17$, which is the famous Reichardt-Lind equation which is known to be everywhere locally, but not globally, soluble) and it has the unique rational point $(0:1:0)$. However, this point is singular: so now consider the normalization $X'$ of $X$: it has two points above $(0:1:0)$, neither of which is rational. By the parenthetical remark, $X'$ has local points everywhere, but it doesn't have rational points: therefore $X'$ does not satisfy the HP. Also, $X'$ is birational to $X$, being its normalization.

If you restrict to smooth varieties however, the answer is yes: by Lang-Nishimura, if $X$ and $X'$ are smooth varieties over any field $k$ that are birational to each other, then $X$ has a $k$ point iff $X'$ does.

share|cite|improve this answer
nice example, thank you! – IMeasy Sep 28 '12 at 8:42
I think for the OP's benefit I should also clarify that for Lang-Nishimura you also need properness. Indeed, given a smooth variety $X$ with a single rational point $x$, the variety $Y=X \setminus x$ is birational to $X$ yet has no rational points. – Daniel Loughran Sep 28 '12 at 9:31
Yes, of course. Thank you, Daniel! – René Sep 28 '12 at 13:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.