Let $C$ be a convex subset of $\mathbb R^{2n}$ and $\mathbf 1_C$ be the characteristic function of $C$. Is it true that $$\forall u\in\mathscr S(\mathbb R^n),\quad \langle\mathbf 1_C^{Weyl}u,u\rangle\le \Vert u\Vert_{L^2(\mathbb R^n)}^2,\tag F $$ or more explicitly, $ \iint_{\mathbb R^n\times\mathbb R^n}\mathbf 1_C(x,\xi)\mathscr H(u,u)(x,\xi) dx d\xi\le \Vert u\Vert_{L^2(\mathbb R^n)}^2, $ where $\mathscr H(u,u)$ is the Wigner function given by $$ \mathscr H(u,u)(x,\xi)=\int_{\mathbb R^n}e^{-2i\pi z\cdot \xi} u(x+\frac{z}{2})\bar u(x-\frac{z}{2}) dz. \tag W$$ Since $(W)$ is real-valued, the lhs of $(F)$ is also real. The property is easy for $C$ equal to a half-space, since, due to Segal identity on symplectic transformations of Weyl symbols, the operator with Weyl symbol $\mathbf 1_C$ is, in that case, unitarily equivalent to the multiplication by $H(x_1)$.

Inequality (F) seems to have received the name of Flandrin's conjecture.

  • $\begingroup$ +1, but... What is intuition behind ? Can you write it in terms of Weyl-Moyl product ? May be it can generalized to arbitrary star-product on symplectic manifold, if yes, then how ? What are references ? $\endgroup$ – Alexander Chervov Sep 13 '12 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ Intuition: think about the probability measure with density $\mathbf 1_C/\vert C\vert$. Then the expectation of the Wigner function should be smaller than 1 for a normalized $u$. Note that the Wigner function is real-valued but not positive in general and with integral 1. References: it seems to me that Philippe Jaming spoke about these problems, somewhat linked to his work on the uncertainty principle. I think that Flandrin is an engineer, specialized in signal business. $\endgroup$ – Bazin Sep 13 '12 at 19:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here is a reference : arxiv.org/pdf/1007.1796.pdf $\endgroup$ – jjcale Sep 13 '12 at 19:14

I know this may be too late, but in 2019 appeared a paper containing a counterexample to Flandrin's conjecture:


by Bérangère Delourme, Thomas Duyckaerts & Nicolas Lerner.

Here's the arXiv version.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.