Can someone describe explicitly an abelian group $A$ such that the extension $$0 \to \mathbb{Z} \to A \to \mathbb{Q} \to 0$$ doesn't split ?

Background: The Stein-Serre theorem (Hilton, Stammbach: A course in homol. algebra, Theorem 6.1) states that if $A$ is abelian of countable rank (=maximal number of linear independent elements), then $Ext(A,\mathbb{Z})=0$ implies $A$ free. When applied to $A= \mathbb{Q}$, I conclude $Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})\neq 0$. Moreover, by interpreting $A \in Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ as extension $0 \to \mathbb{Z} \to A \to \mathbb{Q} \to 0$ of abelian groups, there must be an $A$ such that the extension doesn't split. The problem is that the proof of the theorem isn't constructive and doesn't show how to construct such an $A$.

  • $\begingroup$ There should in fact be uncountably many of them! journals.cambridge.org/… What do you get if you quotient the $p$-adic integers by the inclusion $\mathbb{Z}\hookrightarrow \mathbb{Z}_p$? $\endgroup$ – Mark Grant Aug 22 '12 at 21:46
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Mark -- something uncountable. $\endgroup$ – algori Aug 22 '12 at 21:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See also p. 5 of math.jhu.edu/~jmb/note/torext.pdf $\endgroup$ – Damian Rössler Aug 22 '12 at 22:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Consider the canonical exact sequence Z --> \prod_p Z_p --> M, where the product takes place over all primes p. Then M is a Q-vector space (exercise). Picking any non-zero element m in M gives an extension A of Q by Z via pullback; explicitly, A is the set of all elements in \prod_p Z_p that map to the Q-subspace generated by m in M. This extension is non-zero since Hom(Q,\prod_p Z_p) = \prod_p Hom(Q,Z_p) = 0. $\endgroup$ – anon Aug 22 '12 at 22:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @algori: Uncountable, but contains a copy of $\mathbb{Q}$. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Ventullo Aug 23 '12 at 1:11

Nice question. For a prime $p$ let $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)} = \lbrace \frac{a}{b}\in \mathbb{Q}\mid p \nmid b\rbrace$ and $\mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}] = \lbrace \frac{a}{p^n}\in \mathbb{Q}\mid n \ge 0 \rbrace$. Then

$$A := \lbrace (x,y) \in \mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}] \mid x-y \in \mathbb{Z}_{(p)} \rbrace$$ has the desired non-split extension. Informal $A$ consists of all pairs $(x,y) \in \mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{Q}$ where $y$ is the $p$-part in the partial fraction decomposition of $x$ (up to an integer summand).

Proof: Let $\rho: A \to \mathbb{Q}$ be projection onto the first factor and $i: \mathbb{Z} \hookrightarrow A$ inclusion into the second factor. By partial fraction decomposition of the rationals, $\rho$ is surjective and $$\ker(\rho)=0 \times \big(\mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}] \cap \mathbb{Z}_{(p)}\big) = 0 \times \mathbb{Z} = \operatorname{im}(i).$$

Next, let $j: \mathbb{Q} \to A$ be a splitting hom. of $\rho$. Composing $j$ with the projection onto the second factor yields a hom. $f: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}] \le \mathbb{Q}$. Since each endomorphism of $\mathbb{Q}$ is multiplication with some $q \in \mathbb{Q}$ we have $f(x)=qx \in \mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]$ for all $x \in \mathbb{Q}$ which is only possible for $q=0$. Hence $j(x)=(x,0) \in A$ for all $x \in \mathbb{Q}$. Setting $x=1/p$ we obtain $1/p \in \mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ which is the desired contradiction. QED

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Lovely! I think this is what I was going for with my inane comment above. $\endgroup$ – Mark Grant Aug 23 '12 at 19:35
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Very nice example! It's not much of a change, but the exact sequence $0\to\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}\oplus\mathbb{Z}[p^{-1}]\to\mathbb{Q}\to 0$ is an example for the same reason and to my eyes it is more "symmetric". The second map is $n\mapsto(n,-n)$ and the third is $(s,t)\mapsto s+t$. $\endgroup$ – Noah Stein Aug 23 '12 at 20:00
  • $\begingroup$ That's good! I searched long for the example, but not long enough to find this presentation :) Noah, thanks for showing me. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 23 '12 at 20:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Mark Opitz: By the paper linked by Damian, the connecting hom. $\delta: Hom(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}) \to Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ is surjective. Let $\kappa: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ be the canonical hom. If $f \in Hom(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})$, then the extension corresponding to $\delta(f)$ is the pull-back of $(\kappa,f)$, i.e. $A=\lbrace (x,y) \in \mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{Q} \mid f(x)=\kappa(y) \rbrace$. Hence it suffices to find a simple $f$. Let $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}=\oplus_r V_r$ be the decomposition in r-torsion subgroups. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 23 '12 at 23:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ... Then I used $f: \mathbb{Q} \xrightarrow{\kappa} \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z} \twoheadrightarrow V_p \hookrightarrow \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$. Now $(x,y) \in A$ iff $\bar{x}_p = \bar{y}_p$ and $\bar{y}_r = 0$ if $r \neq p$ where $\kappa(x)=(\bar{x}_r)_r$. But this is equivalent to the description above. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 23 '12 at 23:27

Building on Ralph's answer a bit we can get uncountably many inequivalent examples as Mark Grant's comment on the original post suggested there should be.

Let $S,T$ be a partition of the primes into two nonempty sets (or if you prefer, the multiplicative sets generated by these). Localize at these sets and form the sequence $0\to\mathbb{Z}\to S^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\oplus T^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Q}\to 0$, where the first map is $n\mapsto (n,-n)$ and the second is $(a,b)\mapsto a+b$. (My comment on Ralph's answer was the case $T = \{p\}$.) Then the same partial fractions argument as in Ralph's answer shows that this is an exact sequence which does not split.

Now let $U,V$ be another such partition of the primes. Suppose there is an isomorphism $f: S^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\oplus T^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\to U^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\oplus V^{-1}\mathbb{Z}$ making the corresponding exact sequences equivalent. Assume WLOG that $S$ contains at least two elements $p,r\in S$ and $p\in U$.

For any $k\geq 1$, equivalence of the exact sequences gives $f(1/p^k,0) = (a_k,b_k)$ where $a_k+b_k = 1/p^k$. Since $p\in U$ and $U^{-1}\mathbb{Z}\cap V^{-1}\mathbb{Z} = \mathbb{Z}$, we get $(a_k,b_k) = (1/p^k + m_k,-m_k)$ for some $m_k\in\mathbb{Z}$. The map $f$ is a homomorphism, so $f(1,0) = (1 + p^km_k, -p^km_k)$. The value $k$ was arbitrary, so the second component of $f(1,0)$ is divisible by $p^k$ for all $k\geq 1$ and must be zero. Therefore $m_k = 0$ and $f(1/p^k,0) = (1/p^k,0)$ for all $k\geq 0$.

The same argument shows that $f(1/r,0)$ is either $(1/r,0)$ or $(0,1/r)$ depending on whether $r\in U$ or $r\in V$. The second case would make $f(1,0) = (0,1)$, contradicting the above, so $r\in U$. In this way we obtain $S\subseteq U$. The same arguments applied to the isomorphism $f^{-1}$ yield $U\subseteq S$, so $S=U$.

Thus the exact sequences are equivalent if and only if $\{S,T\} = \{U,V\}$. There are uncountably many partitions of the primes into two nonempty sets, so there are uncountably many inequivalent non-split exact sequences $0\to\mathbb{Z}\to A\to\mathbb{Q}\to 0$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your result can be used to show $Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{R}$ as stated in the paper referenced in Mark Grant's comment above: By taking a free resolution $0 \to K \to F \to \mathbb{Q} \to 0$ of countable ranks, the epimorphism $Hom(K,\mathbb{Z}) \to Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ shows that $Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ has cardinality at most $2^{\aleph_0}$. Hence by your result the cardinality is eactly $2^{\aleph_0}$. Since multiplication in $\mathbb{Q}$ makes $Ext(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space (of dimension $2^{\aleph_0}$), the assertion follows. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 24 '12 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Ralph: Wow, then that construction can be seen as a pretty exotic way to construct $\mathbb{R}$ from the rationals! Can one recover the order structure of $\mathbb{R}$ too or only its abstract abelian group structure? $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Aug 24 '12 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ So this means that, $\mathbb{R}\cong (\prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p)/\mathbb{Z}$? A $\mathrm{lim}^1$ exact sequence in Weibel's book shows that $\mathrm{Ext}^1(\mathbb{Q},\mathbb{Z})$ is isomorphic to the latter. $\endgroup$ – Jason Polak Aug 24 '12 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Qfwfq: I'm not aware if order structures on the arguments extend in some way to Ext-groups. But in fact, the isomorphism (of abelian groups / rational vector spaces) nicely connects the most basic groups in math: $\mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R}$. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 24 '12 at 20:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Jason: Yes. Every torsion-free, divisible abelian group of card. $2^{\aleph_0}$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$. It's a nice excercise to show that $(\prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p)/\mathbb{Z}$ is torsion-free and divisible (hint: use Chinese Remainder Theorem to show divisibility). $\endgroup$ – Ralph Aug 24 '12 at 21:56

Let $A$ be a subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}^2$, generated by $e:=(0,1)$ and $f_n:=(1/n!,\alpha_n)$, where $\alpha_n = \frac{1}{n} (\alpha_{n-1} + \nu_n)$, $\alpha_1 = 1$, and $\nu_n \in \mathbb{Z}$, to be specified later.

First of all, note that for each $n$ the vectors $e$ and $f_n$ generate a subgroup $A_n$ that contains $A_{n-1}$, and that $A = \bigcup_n A_n$, so it can be easily checked that $A \cap (0 \times \mathbb{Q})$ is the subgroup generated by $e$, isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$. Furthermore, it is the kernel of the map that calculates the first coordinate, and the image is exactly $\mathbb{Q}$.

Now my aim is to choose $\nu_n$ in such a way that no element of $A$ is divisible enough. Clearly this can be done in many ways. Fix an $n$ for a moment, and notice that for $x \in A_n$ to be divisible by a large prime $p>n$ its second coordinate must equal $\frac{p!}{n!} \alpha_p$ modulo $p$. So by choosing $\nu_p$ we may ensure that a fixed $x$ is not divisible by $p$. What remains is to enumerate them carefully and choose $\nu_p$ in such a way that for every $n$ and every $x \in A_n$ there exists at least one $p$ such that $x$ is not divisible by $p$. Thus we need an injective map $(n,x) \mapsto p$ subject to $p > n$. It is easy but messy to write down... Just to elaborate the whole process: we choose $\nu_n$ in their usual order, and each time we run into a distinguished prime $p$ that is responsible for some $(n,x), n < p$, we should act accordingly using our knowledge of the previous $\alpha$'s.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.