Let $X$ be a scheme (you can assume that $X$ is proper and smooth over an algebraically closed field) and $T$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Pic } X$ (of order prime to the characteristic). Does there exist a finite étale cover $f:Y\to X$ (possibly Galois with Galois group $T$) for which the map $f^* :\text{Pic }X\to\text{Pic }Y$ identifies $\text{Pic } Y$ with the quotient $(\text{Pic }X)/T$?

Of course (except for the claim about $f$ being Galois) it suffices to treat the case when $T$ is cyclic (of order $m$ say). Then we take a generator $L$ of $T$ and $$ Y = \text{Spec} {}_X \bigoplus_{i=0}^{m-1} L^i $$ (the standard construction showing that $H^1(X, \mu_m)$ classifies such covers). I think I can show that the kernel of $\text{Pic }X\to\text{Pic }Y$ is $T$, but I don't know how to prove that it is surjective...

It also reminds me of the Hilbert class field: I don't know much algebraic number theory, but I think that the construction is similar: $K$ is a number field, $X = \text{Spec }\mathcal{O}_K$, $T = \text{Pic }X$ is the class group, then $Y = \text{Spec }\mathcal{O}_H$ where $H$ is the Hilbert class field of $K$, its maximal abelian unramified extension.


1 Answer 1


The answer is "no," even for curves. Say $X$ is a genus 2 curve over $\mathbf{C}$, and $f:Y \to X$ is any finite etale degree $d$ morphism of degree $> 1$. Then $Y$ is a smooth projective curve of genus $d+1 > 2$. In particular, $\mathrm{Pic}(Y)$ has dimension $>2$, so it cannot be a quotient of $\mathrm{Pic}(X)$.

  • $\begingroup$ OOPS! Yes, you're right, thank you! But what if we assume that $X$ and $Y$ have trivial $\text{Pic}^0$, does it help? Is there a good description of the cokernel of $f^*: \text{Pic }X\to \text{Pic }Y$ (or just the next group in some long exact sequence extending $f^*$)? $\endgroup$ Aug 20, 2012 at 0:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For finite Galois covers f:Y ---> X with group G, the best tool I know is the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence for etale cohomology with coefficients in G_m (i.e., H^p(G,H^q(Y,G_m)) ===> H^{p+q}(X,G_m)) and the fact that H^1(X,G_m) = Pic(X). This gives an LES involving the map Pic(X) ---> Pic(Y)^G. It doesn't suggest a good statement when Pic^0 is 0, but does lead to counterexamples to hopes of the form Pic(Y) = Pic(X)/T; we just need to find such Y and G with Pic(Y)^G strictly smaller than Pic(Y). $\endgroup$
    – anon
    Aug 20, 2012 at 1:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.