3
$\begingroup$

Let $f\colon X \to S$ be a smooth proper morphism of schemes such that all fibers are geometrically connected of dimension $n$. Then the trace morphism yields an isomorphism $H^{2n}_{\rm DR}(X/S) \cong {\mathscr O}_S$ (here $H^p_{\rm DR}(X/S) = H^p(Rf_*\Omega^{\bullet}_{X/S})$ denotes the (relative) algebraic De Rham cohomology).

Question: What would be a correct generalization to morphisms of algebraic stacks?

For representable morphisms I would think (naively) that one might construct the trace morphism "as usual" and then prove it to be an isomorphism by a descent argument. But I did not check any details and a reference (or a counter example) would be appreciated very much.

For non-representable morphism it is maybe not even clear what the de Rham complex is in general? But even if $X$ is a Deligne-Mumford stack over a scheme $S$, I am not sure what the correct the generalization would be (I am worried about the example of the classifying stack of a finite $p$-group over a field of characteristic $p$).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe the article arXiv:0811.1955 has part of what you are looking for. $\endgroup$ – Damian Rössler Aug 6 '12 at 8:55
  • $\begingroup$ It might be helpful to check LMB and Olsson's article 'Sheaves on Artin stacks', for cotangent complexes on stacks. $\endgroup$ – shenghao Aug 6 '12 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Damian: Thanks a lot for that reference. This at least might help for $S = Spec k$, $k$ a field. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Wedhorn Aug 6 '12 at 19:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.