There is a popular (and I think helpful) example of etale covers, namely covers of Riemann surfaces with ramification points removed. Is there a similarly accessible example to motivate Nisnevich covers?

4Personally, I have found examples of Nisnevich covers unenlightening. The most important property is: $p: U \to X$ is a Nisnevich cover if and only if it is an étale cover, and there exists a sequence $X \supset Z_1 \supset Z_2 \supset ... \supset Z_n = \varnothing$ of closed subschemes such that $p$ has a section over each $Z_i  Z_{i + 1}$. This allows induction arguments. And of course another motivation for Nisnevich is that every Nisnevich cover of a field has a section, and so the cohomological dimension of a "point" $Spec(k)$ is zero  a "failing" of the étale topology. – name Jul 27 '12 at 1:50

See my question mathoverflow.net/questions/103257/… for something I would have just emailed you. – David Roberts Jul 27 '12 at 2:42
Well, a representative example is where you take some arbitrary etale cover Y of X which splits over a closed subvariety Z of X, then form the Nisnevich cover of X consisting of the open complement X  Z together with the open subscheme Y' of Y where you remove all but one of the copies of Z lying above Z. For instance Z could be a point, and our field could be algebraically closed.
The intuition I find helpful is that descent for the Nisnevich topology is meant to be an easiertopreciselyphrase consequence of the principle "X is gotten by gluing XZ to a tubular neighborhood of Z, along the punctured tubular neighborhood of Z". The idea being that, in the situation of the previous paragraph, the tubular neighborhoods of Z in X and Z in Y should be the same, Y > X being etale.
As an example of this intuition, note that if X is a smooth variety of dimension n (over an algebraically closed field for simplicity) and x is a point of X, then by choosing n independent parameters at x you can find a Zariski neighborhood X' of x and an etale map X' > A^n which, together with A^n  0 > A^n, makes a Nisnevich cover of A^n with intersection equal to X'x. This corresponds (ish) to the fact that the tubular neighborhood of x in X should be the same as the tubular neighborhood of 0 in A^n.