Let $\pi:X \longrightarrow C$ be a smooth projective morphism onto a smooth projective curve, and $F$ be a central fiber. If the Kodaira dimension $\kappa (F)$ is nonnegative, is $\pi_{\ast} \mathcal O_X (k K_{X/C})$ nonzero for sufficiently divisible $k$? If it is, can anyone arrange an algebraic proof?

  • $\begingroup$ I think the question is equivalent to say that, if some central fiber is of nonnegative Kodaira dimension, is $X$ of nonnegative Kodaira dimension? $\endgroup$
    – Hu Zhengyu
    Jul 13, 2012 at 20:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, consider the case X=P^1 x C, where C is a curve of genus at least 1, and the map is projection onto P^1. $\endgroup$
    – user5117
    Jul 13, 2012 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ I think he means that $X/C$ is of non-negative relative Kodaira dimension. $\endgroup$ Jul 13, 2012 at 23:54

1 Answer 1


I think one can argue as follows. (Let me know if I made a mistake!)

Choose $k$ large enough so that $kK_F$ has a nonzero global section for some fibre $F$. For any fibre $F$, we have $K_F = K_{X/C}~_{|F}$. So deformation invariance of plurigenera says that the function

$$h^0(X_p, k K_{X/C}~_{|X_p})$$ is constant on $C$ (where now $X_p$ denotes the fibre over the point $p \in C$). Therefore by Grauert's theorem (Hartshorne III.12.9) any global section of kK_F must come from the sheaf $\pi_* O_X(kK_{X/C})$. Since we have chosen $k$ large enough that $kK_F$ has a nonzero global section, the sheaf $\pi_* O_X(kK_{X/C})$ must be nonzero.

Presumably this doesn't satisfy your requirement of an algebraic proof, because it use deformation invariance of plurigenera, which currently only has an analytic proof in general.

  • $\begingroup$ Is it possible to give an algebraic proof? I guess this problem is easier than invariance of plurigenera. $\endgroup$
    – Hu Zhengyu
    Jul 13, 2012 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ You're right; I edited to make the proof simpler. $\endgroup$
    – user5117
    Jul 13, 2012 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ Artie, I'm confused about the new proof. Suppose the section $F$ lies over $0 \in C$. How do you know that $0 \in U$? $\endgroup$ Jul 13, 2012 at 23:53
  • $\begingroup$ Karl: I'm not sure I understand your comment. If a divisor lies over a point in C, then its restriction to the generic fibre will be trivial. Let me know if I'm missing your point. $\endgroup$
    – user5117
    Jul 14, 2012 at 20:46
  • $\begingroup$ Artie, maybe I'm being dumb with terminology, you are saying that $F$ is the generic fiber? I somehow thought that $F$ was supposed to be a closed fiber (the original questioner called it a central fiber, which I interpreted as a fiber over a special closed point). $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2012 at 23:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.