0
$\begingroup$

I am confused about a step in Hartshorne's proof (final part of Corollary 1.4) that an algebraic set $Y$ in affine n-space $\mathbb{A}^n$ having a prime ideal $I(Y)$ in the polynomial ring over $n$ variables $A$. The proof goes as follows:

Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a prime ideal, and suppose $Z(p) = Y_1 \cup Y_2$. Then $p = I(Y_1)$ intersection $I(Y_2)$. Then (here is where I am confused!) $\mathfrak{p}$ equals $I(Y_1)$ or $I(Y_2)$. Then of course $Y$ equals $Y_1$ or $Y_2$, thus $Y$ is irreducible.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

If $P=I\cap J$ is prime, and if $P$ is not equal to $I$ or $J$, then choose $i\in I\setminus J$ and $j\in J\setminus I$. Then $ij\in P$, so $i\in P$ or $j\in P$. Contradiction either way. Thus $P=I$ or $P=J$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.