MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume $V$ be a genus larger than 1 handlebody, $S=\partial_{+} V$.

Denote $N$ be the normal closure of $MCG(V)$ in $MCG(S)$.

Is there any material related to the quotient group $MCG(S)/N$ ? Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
@l.Mosher:sorry I have it edited. – yanqing Jun 28 '12 at 13:26
@Lee: He probably means normal closure. – Misha Jun 28 '12 at 13:27
Thanks, it makes sense now. – Lee Mosher Jun 28 '12 at 13:43
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The normal closure of $MCG(V)$ in $MCG(S)$ is all of $MCG(S)$. To see why, we know that $MCG(S)$ is generated by Dehn twists, so it suffices to prove that each Dehn twist is in the normal closure. Consider the Dehn twist $\tau_c$ about an essential simple closed curve $c$. There exists a homeomorphism $f : S \to S$ such that $c' = f(c)$ bounds a properly embedded disc $D \subset V$, and $\tau_{c'}$ extends to a twist about the disc $D$, so $\tau_c = f^{-1} \circ \tau_{c'} \circ f$ is in the normal closure of $MCG(V)$. To find this homeomorphism, observe that the there is one $MCG(S)$-orbit of nonseparating curves, and for each partition $genus(S)=m+n$ there is one $MCG(S)$ orbit of separating curves whose complements have genus $m,n$. Each such orbit clearly has a representative bounding a disc in $V$.

share|cite|improve this answer
nice,thanks a lot! – yanqing Jun 28 '12 at 13:46
@L.Mosher: Assign $MCG(S)$ a clay graph $G$. Obviously there is a subgraph $G^{*}$ with vertices corresponding to $MCG(V)$. Is there a vertex in $G$ which is arbitrarily far from $G^{*}$ ? – yanqing Jun 28 '12 at 14:00
@yanqing: I don't know what a clay graph is. – Lee Mosher Jun 28 '12 at 14:38
Cayley graph. And the answer to your question is "Yes." Said another way, the inclusion of $MCG(V)$ into $MCG(S)$ is not "coarsely dense." I don't know a slick proof of this. – Sam Nead Jun 28 '12 at 17:38
This follows from the fact that $MCG(V)$ has infinite index in $MCG(S)$. For any subgroup of any finitely generated group $G$, if the subgroup is coarsely dense then it has finite index in $G$. There might be a very slick proof somewhere, but there is a pretty quick proof of a more general result in my paper with Sageev and Whyte "Quasi-actions on trees I", which says that two subgroups of $G$ at finite Hausdorff distance from each other are commensurable in $G$. – Lee Mosher Jun 28 '12 at 17:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.