3
$\begingroup$

I want to condition a stochastic process $X$ on the current value of another process $Y$ in a continuous-time setting. So I am looking for a process $Z$ such that for every fixed $t$, $$Z_t = E\big(X_t \big| \sigma(Y_t)\big) \quad \text{a.s.}\tag{1}$$ Uniqueness holds when $Z$ is required to be cadlag. Alternatively, uniqueness follows when $Z$ is required to be optional and $$Z_{\tau} 1_{\{\tau<\infty\}}= E\big(X_{\tau}1_{\{\tau<\infty\}} \big| \sigma(Y_t)\big) \quad \text{a.s.}\tag{2}$$ holds for every stopping time $\tau$. Existence follows by a monotone class argument for $X$ if I can prove that the process $$X(t,\omega)=1_{[a,b)}(t) 1_F(\omega)$$ admits $Z$ as in $(1)$ or $(2)$. Here $[a,b)$ is some interval and $F$ a measurable set. But I am not able to show this. Any hints or ideas?

$\endgroup$
11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You need to be more precise to get a meaningful answer. What exactly is "stochastic process" here? I mean, what kind of joint measurability/continuity/... w.r.t. $\omega$ and $t$ do you assume and want to preserve in the conditional expectation you want to construct? I mean, without any such restrictions, you can just extend to $N_t$ arbitrarily and there is nothing to talk about. $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 15, 2011 at 12:54
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I edited my question to make it more precise. $\endgroup$
    – pharms
    Dec 16, 2011 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Which sigma field is F measurable with respect to in your indicator function? Perhaps more importantly what filtrations for X and Y are in the background? $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2011 at 17:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Let me ask a simple test question to understand what you are looking for. Assume that $Y_t=tX_t$ and $X_t$ is some non-degenerate random process that is as nice as you want. What nice properties of $Z$ do you expect to get at and near $t=0$? If I understand things right, the conditional expectation conditioning on $Y_t$ is here $Z_t=X_t$ for $t\ne 0$ and $Z_0=EX_0$. Note that I can put that degeneration to many places simultaneously screwing things up quite a bit. $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Dec 16, 2011 at 18:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can do this by combining optional/predictable projection in forwards and reverse time, as along as you assume some properties on Y. Namely, that it satisfies a "strong-Markov" property in both the forwards and reverse time directions. Your question does not mention any assumptions on Y though. $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2011 at 21:55

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.