7
$\begingroup$

Let $Ho(Spc)$ be the homotopy category of spaces. There is an adjoint pair $$ \Sigma^k \colon Ho(Spc) \leftrightarrows Ho(Spc)\colon \Omega^k, $$ where $\Sigma^k$ is the $k$-th supension functor and $\Omega^k$ is the $k$-fold loop space functor ($k\ge 1)$. This adjunction has as associated monad the functor $\Omega^k\Sigma^k$. My question is what are the algebras over this monad (a precise reference to this fact would be welcome).

If we denote by $Ho^s$ the homotopy category of spectra, then there is another adjunction $$ \Sigma^{\infty} \colon Ho(Spc) \leftrightarrows Ho^s\colon \Omega^{\infty}, $$ where $\Sigma^{\infty}$ is the suspension spectrum functor. My question is again what are the algebras over the monad $\Omega^{\infty}\Sigma^{\infty}$.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

15
$\begingroup$

I know interesting answers to two questions that are not the same as the one asked, but are related.

  1. Consider the monad $T=\Omega^\infty L_{K(n)}\Sigma^\infty$ on the homotopy category of spaces. It is straightforward to construct a functor $$\Omega^\infty:Ho(\{K(n)-\text{local spectra}\})\to \{T-\text{algebras}\}.$$ One can show using the Bousfield-Kuhn functor and related ideas that this is actually an equivalence.

  2. Consider the monad $Q=\Omega^\infty\Sigma^\infty$ on the category of based spaces (not up to homotopy). If we use spectra in the sense of Lewis and May, there is an evident functor $\Omega^\infty:\{\text{spectra}\}\to\{Q-\text{algebras}\}$. This is actually full and faithful (even on spectra whose homotopy groups are concentrated in negative degrees), which means that the point-set level $Q$-action carries a lot more information than you might naively guess. The key point in the proof is that we can use a trick with the Hopf map and space-filling curves to express $S^2$ as the coequaliser of two based maps from $S^3$ to $S^3$. This gives a natural way to express $\Omega^2X$ as the equaliser of two maps from $\Omega^3X$ to $\Omega^3X$, which allows us to do a bunch of things by induction.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't know about this space-filling trick. Has it been written down? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 2, 2011 at 20:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I could send you a scruffy document that contains it. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 2, 2011 at 20:40
4
$\begingroup$

(Everything I say here is up to homotopy equivalence.)

Algebras over $\Omega^k \Sigma^k$ are spaces $X$ equivalent to a $k$-fold loop space $\Omega^k Y$. Algebras over $\Omega^\infty \Sigma^\infty$ are infinite loop spaces; this is a little harder to say, but it is essentially that there is a sequence of spaces $Y_n$ with $Y_0 = X$ and equivalences $Y_n \simeq \Omega Y_{n+1}$.

The original and still canonical reference, which covers all of this in detail, is J.P. May's book "The geometry of iterated loop spaces," Lectures Notes in Mathematics 271.

EDIT: As Neil points out, I've misread the question. The statements above are for spaces, not for objects in the homotopy category of spaces.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ This is certainly morally correct, but I don't think it is accurate as an answer to the question as posed. May constructs a monad $C_k$ on $Spc$ with a map $C_k\to\Omega^k\Sigma^k$. Connected algebras over $C_k$ in $Spc$ are weakly equivalent to $k$-fold loop spaces. However, algebras over the induced monad in $Ho(Spc)$ are more subtle. IIRC, the negative resolution of the 'transfer conjecture' (probably in the 1970s) showed that such algebras need not be infinite loop spaces. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 2, 2011 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Neil: Thanks. I missed that he was taking about "H-infinity" rather than "E-infinity". $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 2, 2011 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your comments. Neil is right, the monads are to be considered in the homotopy category. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 3, 2011 at 0:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .