Consider a moduli scheme $P$ of sheaves $F$ on a Calabi-Yau n-fold $X$ with a section $s\in H^0(F)$. Alternatively, such objects can be described as maps $\mathcal{O}_X \xrightarrow{s} F$ called pairs. Take the universal pair $\mathcal{O}_{X\times P}\xrightarrow{\mathfrak{s}}\mathcal{F}$ on $X\times P$, and construct its push forward $$ H^\bullet(\mathcal{O}_X)\otimes \mathcal{O}_P\xrightarrow{R\pi_*(\mathfrak{s})}R\pi_*(\mathcal{F}) $$ along the projection $\pi: X\times P\to P$. There is then a composition $\kappa$ of morphisms $$ \mathcal{O}_P[-n]\cong H^n(\mathcal{O}_X)[-n]\otimes \mathcal{O}_P\to H^\bullet(\mathcal{O}_X)\otimes \mathcal{O}_P\xrightarrow{R\pi_*(\mathfrak{s})}R\pi_*(\mathcal{F})\,, $$ where the first map is induced by the inclusion of the fourth cohomology group of $\mathcal{O}_X$.
Assuming that the family $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies $R^i\pi_*(\mathcal{F}) = 0$ for $i>0$ (i.e., $H^i(F)=0$ for $i>0$ for all such pairs $\mathcal{O}_X\to F$), is it true that $\kappa =0$ in the derived category of sheaves on $P$?
I tried taking all sorts of $\pi_*$-acyclic resolutions of $\mathcal{O}_{X\times P}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ and finding an actual morphism of complexes between them, but to no avail. At the same time, I did not see why this statement would be false.