6
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be open and bounded with a sufficiently smooth boundary. Let $L$ be a second order differential operator with variable coefficients, given by $$Lu = \partial_i(a^{ij}\partial_ju) + b^i\partial_ku + c u.$$ For an arbitrary $f$, consider the boundary value problem posed in $\Omega$ $$ \begin{cases} Lu = f \\ \text{with boundary conditions}\\ \end{cases} $$ The well-posedness of a weak solution and its regularity is extensively studied.

For instance, in Evan's PDEs we find for Dirichlet boundary conditions

THEOREM 5 (Higher boundary regularity). Let $m$ be a nonnegative integer, and assume $ a^{i j}, b^i, c \in C^{m+1}(\bar{\Omega}) \quad(i, > j=1, \ldots, n) $, and $ \partial \Omega \text { is } C^{m+2} $, and $ f \in H^m(\Omega) . $ Suppose that $u \in H_0^1(\Omega)$ is a weak solution of the boundary-value problem. Then $$ u \in H^{m+2}(\Omega), $$ and we have the estimate $$ \|u\|_{H^{m+2}(\Omega)} \leq C\left(\|f\|_{H^m(\Omega)}+\|u\|_{L^2(\Omega)}\right), $$ the constant $C$ depending only on $m, \Omega$ and the coefficients of $L$.

In Grisvard's Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains we find Theorem 2.5.1.1 which gives the same result for more general boundary conditions but with $a^{ij} \in C^{m,1}(\overline{\Omega}), b^i \in C^{m,1}(\overline{\Omega})$ and $ \partial \Omega \text { is } C^{m+1,1}.$

My question is, what is the most relaxed conditions one can assume on the coefficients $a^{ij},b^i,c$, and $f$, and still get a similar regularity in Sobolev spaces as given in the previous theorems? The boundary can be assumed to be sufficiently smooth!

Providing references for further reading is much appreciated.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have a look at the book by Krylov:Elliptic and parabolic equations in Sobolev spaces. If the operator is in non-divergence form the regularity theory requires less smoothness since you do not need to differentiate the top order coefficients. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4 at 20:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you are willing to fight through it, there is also the parabolic Ladyzhenskaja book, chapter III.§6 I think. $\endgroup$
    – Hannes
    Commented Aug 5 at 12:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Hannes I always wonder why such an important monograph is not re-released with modern typesetting. $\endgroup$
    – Akira
    Commented Aug 5 at 14:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You should note that the result 2.5.1.1 in Grisvard asks for a solution in $W^{2,p}$ already to get $W^{k+2,p}$ regularity, while the result in Evans only asks for a solution in $H^1_0 = W^{1,2}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28 at 21:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

For $m=0$ a very detailed study is given in the same book of Grisvard in Section 5.2. Basically, the diffusion $a^{ij}$ needs enough regularity so that you can use the technique of "freezing the coefficients" (Lipschitz is sufficient), while $b$ can be in $L^\infty$. Then there are geometric conditions on the coefficient $a^{ij}$ that are explained in detail in that section of Grisvard's book. In particular, with Theorem 5.2.2 you can compute the co-dimension that potentially prevents your solution from belonging to $W^{2,p}$. It's similar to working out corner singularities.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .