Consider the sequence of stochastic processes $(X_n, n \geq 1)$, where $X_n = (X_{t;n})_{t\in \mathbb Z}$ and: \begin{equation}\label{I}\tag{SP} X_{t;n} = \sum_{j=0}^\infty \theta_{jn} \varepsilon_{t-j;n} \end{equation} with $\sum_{j=0}^\infty \theta_{jn}^2 < \infty$ and $(\varepsilon_{t;n})_{t\in \mathbb Z} \overset{\text{iid}}{\sim} \mu_n(dx)$ with zero mean and variance $\sigma_n =1$, for all $n$. Suppose: \begin{equation}\label{uan}\tag{Uan} \quad\quad \max_{0\leq j } |\theta_{jn}| \longrightarrow 0\quad (n \to \infty). \end{equation}
Note that each $X_n$ is strictly stationary. Suppose $(X_{t})_{t\in \mathbb Z}$ is another strictly stationary satisfying the following two conditions:
- $E[X_{t;n}^2]\longrightarrow E[X_{t}^2]< \infty$, as $n \to \infty$, for all $t$;
- $(X_{t_1n}, X_{t_2n},\dotsc, X_{t_pn}) \Longrightarrow (X_{t_1}, X_{t_2},\dotsc, X_{t_p})$ as $n \to \infty$ for all $t_1 <t_2<\cdots < t_p$ (weak convergence of finite dimensional vectors).
Now, fix $(t_1 <t_2<\cdots < t_p)$. We can show, starting from condition 2 and using (\ref{I}) and (\ref{uan}), that: $$\sum_{j=0}^n \left(\theta_{jn} , \theta_{(j+ t_2 - t_1)n }, \dotsc, \theta_{(j+ t_p - t_1)n } \right) \varepsilon_{t_1-j;n} \Longrightarrow (X_{t_1}, X_{t_2},\dotsc, X_{t_p})\quad (n \to \infty).$$ For simplicity, denote $X_{jn}:=\left(\theta_{jn} , \theta_{(j+ t_2 - t_1)n }, \dotsc, \theta_{(j+ t_p - t_1)n } \right) \varepsilon_{t_1-j;n}$ and $X:=(X_{t_1}, X_{t_2},\dotsc, X_{t_p})$ (note that $X_{jn}$ and $X$ depends on $t_1, t_2,\dotsc, t_p$). So, the last equation means that $$S_n := \sum_{j=0}^n X_{jn} \Longrightarrow X\quad (n \to \infty).$$ Finally, we can show that there exist a non-negative definite matrix $\Sigma$ and a Levy measure $\nu$ such that the characteristic function of $X$ is: $$\varphi_X(u)= \exp\left\{ \frac{-u' \Sigma u}{2} +\int_{\mathbb R^p} \left[e^{iu'x} - 1- i u'x \right] d\nu(x) \right\}.$$ We adopt the following notation: \begin{equation} X_{jn}\sim \nu_{jn}(dx), \,\, \nu_n(dx):= \sum_{j=0}^n\nu_{jn}(dx). \end{equation} Notice that $\nu_{jn}$ is a probability measure in $\mathbb R^p$, since it depends on $\mu_{n}(dx)$ — the probability measure of the iid $(\varepsilon_{t;n})_{t \in \mathbb Z}$ defined on borelians of $\mathbb R$ — but also depends on the vector $\left(\theta_{jn} , \theta_{(j+ t_2 - t_1)n }, \dotsc, \theta_{(j+ t_p - t_1)n } \right)\in \mathbb R^p$.
Moreover, the measure $\nu$ can be characterized as follows: let $\mathcal C_\#$ be the class of continuous and bounded functions vanishing on a neighborhood of $0$. Then: \begin{equation}\label{M}\tag{M} \int f \, \nu_n(dx) \to \int f \, \nu(dx),\quad \forall f \in \mathcal C_\# \quad (n \to \infty). \end{equation} or equivalently (See Barczy and Pap - Portmanteau theorem for unbounded measures): $$\nu_n(E) \longrightarrow \nu(E), \quad (E\,\,\ \nu\hbox{-contunity set}, 0 \notin \overline{E},\,\, n \to \infty )\label{MI}\tag{M'}$$
Question
Notice that $E[S_n]= \int_{\mathbb R^p} x \nu_n(dx) =0$, for all $n$. I want to show that: $$\int_{\mathbb R^p} x \nu(dx) =0\label{q1}\tag{I}$$ Can we show (\ref{q1}) or can we give a counterexample?
Attempt
First, I can show that condition 1 and (\ref{uan}) imply: \begin{equation}\label{ui}\tag{UI} \int_{\mathbb R^p} |x|^2 \nu_{n}(dx) = \sum_{j=0}^n \int_{\mathbb R^p} |x|^2 \nu_{jn}(dx) \longrightarrow \int_{\mathbb R^p} |x|^2 \nu(dx)< \infty,\quad ( n\to \infty) \end{equation}
It is worth noting that we can define $$m_n(B):= \int_{B} |x|^2 \nu_n(dx)< \infty\quad\hbox{ and }\quad m(B):= \int_{B} |x|^2 \nu(dx)< \infty$$ for all borelian $B$. Since $E[S_n]=0$, we have $$\int_{\mathbb R^p} \frac{x}{|x|^2} m_n(dx)=0$$ and (\ref{q1}) is equivalent to: $$\int_{\mathbb R^p} \frac{x}{|x|^2} m(dx)$$ I would venture to say that this is true due to (\ref{ui}), using an argument similar to uniform integrability.
Sorry if I contextualized the issue too much, but I needed to avoid counterexamples like this answer. In this same question, we can also find more technical details about the context given here.