I have been thinking about the validity of the following inequality:
if $P(z)=\sum_{k=0}^na_kz^k, a_n\neq 0$ and $P(z)$ is non-zero in $|z|<1, $ then for $\theta \in [0, 2\pi],$ and $p>0$
\begin{align*}
&\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left|n\left(1-\frac{|a_0|-|a_n|}{n(|a_0|+|a_n|)}\right)P(e^{i\theta})+(\eta-e^{i\theta})P'(e^{i\theta})\right|^{p}d\theta\\
&\qquad\qquad\quad \leq \left[n\left(1-\frac{|a_0|-|a_n|}{n(|a_0|+|a_n|)}\right)\right]^{p}\int_{0}^{2\pi}|P(e^{i\theta})|^{p}d\theta,
\end{align*}
for any $\eta$ lying in the closed unit disc.
In fact the above inequity is motivated by the inequality from Melas and Rubinstein [2] who proved that
if $P(z) $ is a polynomial of degree $n$ then for $\theta \in [0, 2\pi],$
\begin{align*}
&\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left|nP(e^{i\theta})+(1-e^{i\theta})P'(e^{i\theta})\right|^{p}d\theta\\
&\qquad\qquad\quad \leq n^{p}\int_{0}^{2\pi}|P(e^{i\theta})|^{p}d\theta.
\end{align*}
Alternatively the above result [due to Melas] can be established directly through an inequality due to Arestov [1] involving admissible operators on the class of polynomials. Is my above claim right? Your suggestions are of great help.
References
[1] Vitaliĭ Vladimirovich Arestov, "On integral inequalities for trigonometric polynomials and their derivatives" (Russian original) (English translation) Mathematics of the USSR, Izvestiya 18, 1-17 (1982), Zbl 0517.42001; Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, 45, 3-22 (1981), MR607574, Zbl 0538.42001.
[2] Antonios D. Melas and Zalman Rubinstein, "Problem 10255 and solution" American Mathematical Monthly, 103, 177-181 (1996).