16
$\begingroup$

Consider the (continuous, injective, abelian group homomorphism) map $\Phi \colon \mathbb{R} \to \prod_{a>0} (\mathbb{R}/a\mathbb{Z})$ (where the target is given the product topology) taking $x\in \mathbb{R}$ to the family $(x \mod a) _ {a>0}$; depending on your inclination, you may prefer to view it as $\Phi \colon \mathbb{R} \to (\mathbb{S}^1)^{\mathbb{R} _ {>0}}$ taking $x$ to $(\exp(2i\pi b x)) _ {b>0}$ (with $b=1/a$).

I'd like to know more about the following two topological spaces, indeed topological groups:

  • The image of $\Phi$ with the subspace topology, call it $R$, or, equivalently, the coarsest topology on $\mathbb{R}$ making $\Phi$ continuous (this is strictly coarser than the usual topology).

  • The closure of the image of $\Phi$ with the subspace topology, call it $S$ (since the target of $\Phi$ is compact, so is $S$).

There seems to be a lot of interesting things to say about $R$ and $S$ in the line of “examples and counterexamples in general topology”; for example, it turns out that if $(x_n)$ is a real sequence such that $\Phi(x_n) \to 0$ then in fact $x_n \to 0$ in the reals, so $R$ has the same convergent sequences as $\mathbb{R}$ even though it does not have the same topology (so $R$ is not metrizable). I have a million more questions about $R$, about $S$, and also about the map $\beta\mathbb{R} \to S$ (and maybe about $\beta R \to S$ while I'm at it), but rather than ask a million questions now, let me start by asking what has already been written about them out there in the literature:

Question: Do $R$ and $S$ have standard names? Are they described in a paedagogical fashion in some textbook on general topology or such text?

A presentation in the spirit of Steen & Seebach's classic Counterexamples in Topology would be a good start (I was unable to find these spaces in the book in question but, of course, I may have missed them). A name would help with the search (this is somewhat related to solenoids, but solenoids are metrizable whereas $R$ and $S$ are not, as I mention above).

Of course, if you have some favorite facts to share about $R$ and $S$, they're welcome as well.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

16
$\begingroup$

Short answer: $S$ is known as the Bohr compactification of $\mathbf R$ (often denoted $S=b\mathbf R$, see [1], 26.11), and $R$ is known as $\mathbf R$ with the Bohr topology (often denoted $R=\mathbf R^+$, see e.g. [2, 3, 4]).

For a longer answer, write $\chi_b(x)=\exp(2\pi ibx)$ so that your $\Phi(x)=(\chi_b(x))_{b>0}$. Then $R$ is $\mathbf R$ with the weakest topology making $\chi_b$ continuous for all $b>0$. Since $\chi_0$ is constant and $\chi_{-b}$ is $\chi_b$ composed with complex conjugation, we see that it makes no difference to use $(\chi_b(x))_{b\in\mathbf R}$ instead. That shows that your definition coincides with those in loc. cit.

More generally if $G$ is any locally compact abelian group with dual $\hat G$ and we write $$\Phi(g)=(\chi(g))_{\chi\in\hat G},$$ these references define $bG$ as the closure of $\Phi(G)$ in $\mathbf T^{\hat G}$, and $G^+$ as $G$ with its relative topology in $bG$. Favorite facts about $G^+$ are that it is sequentially closed in $bG$ (no sequence in $G^+$ can converge to a point of $bG\smallsetminus G^+$ [5]), and Glicksberg's theorem that $G^+$ has exactly the same compact sets as $G$ [6]. The map $\beta G\to bG$ is also studied in [7].

Finally, since you ask, my own favorite facts about the Bohr topology $G^+$ occur for $G=\mathbf R^n$, $n>1$: namely, a parabola is Bohr dense in the plane, and more generally the image of any polynomial map $\mathbf R^m\to \mathbf R^n$ is Bohr dense in its affine hull [8].


[1] Hewitt, E.; Ross, K. A., Abstract harmonic analysis. Vol. I. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. VIII, 519 p. (1963). ZBL0115.10603.

[2] Comfort, W. Wistar; Hernández, Salvador; Trigos-Arrieta, F. Javier, Relating a locally compact Abelian group to its Bohr compactification, Adv. Math. 120, No. 2, 322-344 (1996). ZBL0863.22004.

[3] Hernández, Salvador, The dimension of an LCA group in its Bohr topology, Topology Appl. 86, No. 1, 63-67 (1998). ZBL0935.22006.

[4] Hernández, Salvador; Remus, Dieter; Javier Trigos-Arrieta, F., Contributions to the Bohr topology by W.W. Comfort, Topology Appl. 259, 28-39 (2019). ZBL1414.22012.

[5] See MR 40:4685.

[6] Glicksberg, I., Uniform boundedness for groups, Can. J. Math. 14, 269-276 (1962). ZBL0109.02001.

[7] Zlatoš, Pavol, The Bohr compactification of an abelian group as a quotient of its Stone-Čech compactification, Semigroup Forum 101, No. 2, 497-506 (2020). ZBL1471.22001.

[8] Zbl 0795.22003, Zbl 1355.37048

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The Bohr compactification is the closure of the image, in which the image does have dense range. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 12, 2022 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ This general technique is a great way to get interesting compactifications. For example, if we replace the codomain by a product of Pontrjagin duals of the rationals, instead of R/aR, which is a circle, Pontrjagin dual to the integers, then we get a torsion-free compactification of your LCA group module its torsion subgroup. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 12, 2022 at 20:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is there perhaps an ambiguity where some people speak of the “Bohr compactification of the reals” to mean the Bohr compactification of the reals with the discrete topology (i.e., as an abstract group) as opposed to the usual topology as in my question? $\endgroup$
    – Gro-Tsen
    Commented Dec 12, 2022 at 21:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gro-Tsen I don't think there is ambiguity, $bG$ and $G^+$ are defined for an explicitly topological group. You'll see in loc. cit. that they write $G^\sharp$ for $G^+$ when the discrete topology is assumed on $G$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 12, 2022 at 21:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .