4
$\begingroup$

Denote by $f(n)$ the maximal number of distinct divisors of $k$ integer numbers $1\leq a_1<a_2<\ldots<a_k\leq n$, where $k$ is not fixed and $a_1+\ldots+a_k\leq n$. I'm interested in the asymptotics of $f(n)$.

For example, $f(4)=3$ since 4 has 3 divisors, $f(10)=5$ since 10=6+4 and 1,2,3,4,6 divide 4 or 6.

Notice that if we take numbers $1,2,3,\ldots,t$ such that $1+\ldots+t=t(t+1)/2\leq n$ (so $t\sim\sqrt{2n}$), then we have exactly $t$ divisors, so $f(n)>\sqrt{n}$.

Question: is it possible to obtain a better asymptotics?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

No, if you do not care on multiplicative factor: namely, $f(n)\leqslant 2\sqrt{n}$. Use the following

Lemma. For any real $x>0$ and any positive integer $a$, $a$ has at most $a/x$ divisors which are not less than $x$.

Proof. Let $d_1>d_2>\ldots>d_m\geqslant x$ be these divisors. Then $a/d_1<a/d_2<\ldots<a/d_m$, and these are integers, thus $a/d_m\geqslant m$ and $a\geqslant md_m\geqslant mx$, so $m\leqslant a/x$ as needed.

Thus $a_i$'s have at most $(a_1+\ldots+a_k)/x\leqslant n/x$ divisors which are at least $x$, and also at most $x$ divisors which are less than $x$, totally at most $x+n/x$ divisors. It remains to put $x=\sqrt{n}$ to get $f(n)\leqslant 2\sqrt{n}$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .