1
$\begingroup$

Consider $N \times N$ matrices

$$A = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & & 0 \\ \vdots & 1 & 0 & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & & \ddots & \ddots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots &1 & 0 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ and

$$B=\operatorname{diag}( \cos(2\pi\cdot 0/N),...,\cos(2\pi\cdot (N-1)/N)).$$

Does anybody know why the eigenvalues of $i(A+A^T)+2B$ are invariant under 90° rotations?- Numerics seem to imply this. What I mean by this is that if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue, then also $e^{i \frac{\pi}{2}} \lambda.$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ This property of the eigenvalues does not seem to hold for $N=2$, $N=3$ or $N=4$ (I haven't tried any higher). Of course, for $N=2$ or $N=3$, this can only be true if all eigenvalues are zero (but they aren't). For $N=4$, I had some hope, but alas, no: The eigenvalues are $i\sqrt{3} $, $-i\sqrt{3} $, $0$, $0$. $\endgroup$ Jul 31, 2022 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelEngelhardt sorry there was a 2 missing in front of $B$, now it should be fine. $\endgroup$
    – Sascha
    Jul 31, 2022 at 13:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related? mathoverflow.net/questions/426279 $\endgroup$
    – Fred Hucht
    Jul 31, 2022 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ The new factor 2 in front of $B$ makes things rather more pathological: For $N=2$ and $N=4$, the matrices now are deficient, consisting of $2\times 2$ Jordan blocks, all with eigenvalue 0; so yes, in a trivial sense, you could say that, if 0 is an eigenvalue, also $e^{i\pi /2} 0$ is an eigenvalue. For $N=3$, the eigenvalues are nonzero, and the claimed property doesn't (and can't) hold. $\endgroup$ Jul 31, 2022 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ @FredHucht - if it weren't for that factor $i$ in front of $A+A^T $, which completely changes things ... but if we leave out the factor $i$, the matrix is Hermitean, and the eigenvalues real, so the claimed property again can't arise ... $\endgroup$ Jul 31, 2022 at 15:00

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Assume $N$ is even (this is false when N is odd). Let $X=2B, Y=A+A^T$. Let $$P = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\ 1 & \zeta & \zeta^2 & \cdots & \zeta^{N-1} \\ 1 & \zeta^2 & \zeta^4 & \cdots & \zeta^{2(N-1)} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & \zeta^{N-1} & \zeta^{2(N-1)} & \cdots & \zeta^{(N-1)^2} \\ \end{bmatrix}$$ $$Q = \text{diag}(1, -1, 1, -1, \ldots, 1, -1)$$ where $\zeta=e^{\frac{2i\pi}{N}}$.

One can easily check that $$PXP^{-1}=Y$$ $$PYP^{-1}=X$$ $$QXQ^{-1}=X$$ $$QYQ^{-1}=-Y$$ from which it follows that $$P(X+iY)P^{-1}=Y+iX=i(X-iY)$$ $$Q(X+iY)Q^{-1}=X-iY$$ This shows that $X+iY$ is conjugate to $i(X+iY)$, so its eigenvalues are invariant under multiplication by $i$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.