3
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a $C^\infty$ manifold $M$ and $C^\infty$ vector fields $b,\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k$ on $M$, and for convenience define the set of vector fields $$ \mathcal{S} = \{b,\sigma_1,-\sigma_1,\sigma_2,-\sigma_2,\ldots,\sigma_k,-\sigma_k\}\text{.} $$ Assume also that the "parabolic Hörmander condition" is fulfilled: letting $\mathcal{L}_b(\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k)$ be the smallest Lie algebra that both contains $\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k$ and is closed under $v \mapsto [v,b]$, every $x \in M$ has $\{f(x):f \in \mathcal{L}_b(\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_k)\}=T_xM$.

Suppose that "$\mathcal{S}$ allows path-accessibility of every point from every open set"; that is:

For every non-empty open $X_1 \subset M$ and every point $x_2 \in M$ there exists a continuous path $\gamma \colon [0,T] \to M$ and values $0=t_0<t_1<\ldots<t_n=T$ such that

  • $\gamma(0) \in X_1$ and $\gamma(T) = x_2$;
  • for each $i=1,\ldots,n$ there exists $f_i \in \mathcal{S}$ such that $\left.\gamma\right|_{[t_{i-1},t_i]}$ is a finite-time orbit of the differential equation $\dot{x}=f_i(x)$.

Does it follow that for every point $x_1 \in M$ and every Lebesgue-positive measure Borel set $X_2 \in \mathcal{B}(M)$, there exists $t_{x_1,X_2} \geq 0$ such that the strong solution $Y_t$ of the Wiener-driven SDE \begin{align*} dY_t &= b(Y_t) dt + \sum_{j=1}^k \sigma_j(Y_t) \circ dW_t^j \\ Y_0 &= x_1 \end{align*} has $\mathbb{P}(Y_{t_{x_1,X_2}} \in X_2)>0$? If so, is this a known result (or easy consequence of a known result)?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't this follow from Hörmander's Theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. Strict positivity of the transition density is typically argued by studying a deterministic system obtained by replacing the noise with deterministic controls; see, e.g., Section 3.3.6.1 of i2m.univ-amu.fr/perso/etienne.pardoux/_media/… $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 8, 2022 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ See also Lemma 3.4 of homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~masdr/JOURNALPUBS/stuart50.pdf $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 8, 2022 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ @NawafBou-Rabee Thanks for the comments. The result in Sec. 3.3.6.1 of the first notes you gave specifically assumes that the Lie algebra generated by the diffusion vector fields covers the whole tangent bundle. (In their notation, they assume $\mathcal{B}(x)=\mathbb{R}^n$, but I want the weaker condition $\mathcal{J}(x)=\mathbb{R}^n$.) Lemma 3.4 of the latter notes specifically addresses accessibility of open sets; this doesn’t imply strict positivity a.e., as there are nowhere-dense sets of positive Lebesgue measure. In short, these references don’t answer the question! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 8, 2022 at 19:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NawafBou-Rabee Apologies, the first reference you gave contains more than just the statement of the theorem! I should take a closer look! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 8, 2022 at 19:43

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

The standard approach is to first use Hörmander’s theorem to prove that the law of $Y_t$ has a smooth density with respect to Lebesgue measure. To prove this density is strictly positive, it suffices to show: for all $x \in M$, $t>0$ and for some $s \in (0,t)$ the following set fills up $M$ $$ A(s,x):=\{ y_s(u) : u \in H^1((0,\infty), \mathbb{R}^k) \} $$ where $y_s(u)$ satisfies the associated control problem $$ \dot{y_s}=b(y_s)+\sum_{j=1}^k \sigma_j(y_s) \dot{u_j}(s)\;, \quad y_0=x\;. $$ These results (and much more) are neatly described (on flat spaces) in Section 3.3 of Michel and Pardoux 1990.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you! I've now managed to adapt the ideas from the Michel and Pardoux notes to obtain my desired result. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 9, 2022 at 7:07
  • $\begingroup$ May I know whether the result holds with non-smooth density? I asked with a similar question here, where I didn't assume a smooth diffusion coefficient. May you kindly have a look at the question? $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Jan 13, 2023 at 2:45
2
$\begingroup$

By adapting the arguments in Sec. 3.3.6.1 of the Michel & Pardoux notes linked to by Nawaf Bou-Rabee, I think I can prove the result. (I will assume for simplicity that the SDE has global existence of strong solutions.)

Lemma. Let $M$ be a $C^1$ manifold. Let $(I,\mathcal{I},\mu)$ and $(J,\mathcal{J},\nu)$ be probability spaces; and over these probability spaces respectively, let $(\Phi_\alpha)_{\alpha \in I}$ and $(\Psi_\beta)_{\beta \in J}$ be random $C^1$ self-embeddings of $M$. Fix $x_1,x_2 \in M$, let $p$ be the law over $\mu$ of $\alpha \mapsto \Phi_\alpha(x_1)$, and let $\tilde{p}$ be the law over $\mu \otimes \nu$ of $(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto \Psi_\beta(\Phi_\alpha(x_1))$. Suppose there exists $m>0$ and an open subset $U$ of a chart on $M$ such that

  • for every $A \in \mathcal{B}(U)$, $p(A) \geq m\mathrm{Leb}(A)$;
  • $\nu(\beta \in J : x_2 \in \Psi_\beta(U))>0$.

Then there exists $\tilde{m}>0$ and a neighbourhood $\tilde{U}$ of $x_2$ contained in a chart on $M$ such that for every $A \in \mathcal{B}(\tilde{U})$, $\tilde{p}(A) \geq \tilde{m}\mathrm{Leb}(A)$.

Proof. One can find a $\nu$-positive measure set $J' \subset J$, a neighbourhood $\tilde{U}$ of $x_2$ contained in a chart on $M$, and a value $r>0$, such that for all $\beta \in J'$ and $x \in \tilde{U}$, we have $\Psi_\beta^{-1}(x) \in U$ and $|\mathrm{det}(D(\Psi_\beta^{-1})(x))| \geq r$. Now take any $A \in \mathcal{B}(\tilde{U})$ and let $$ E := \{(\alpha,\beta) \in I \times J' : \Psi_\beta(\Phi_\alpha(x_1)) \in A \}\text{;} $$ then \begin{align*} \tilde{p}(A) \geq (\mu \otimes \nu)(E) &= \int_{J'} \mu(\alpha \in I : \Psi_\beta(\Phi_\alpha(x_1)) \in A) \, \nu(d\beta) \\ &= \int_{J'} p(\Psi_\beta^{-1}(A)) \, \nu(d\beta) \\ &\geq m\int_{J'} \mathrm{Leb}(\Psi_\beta^{-1}(A)) \, \nu(d\beta) \\ &\geq \underbrace{m\nu(J')r}_{\ \ \ =:\ \tilde{m}}\mathrm{Leb}(A). \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \square \end{align*}

Now applying the Lemma to my problem: Fix $x_1$ and $X_2$. Now fix $x_2 \in M$ such that every neighbourhood of $x_2$ has positive-measure intersection with $X_2$. Due to Hörmander’s theorem, we can find $t'>0$, $m>0$ and a non-empty open subset $X_1$ of a chart on $M$ such that the law of $Y_{t'}$ has Lebesgue density of at least $m$ on $X_1$. Now let $T>0$ be as in the definition of path-accessibility applied to our set $X_1$ and our point $x_2$, and take $t_{x_1,X_2}:=t'+T$. Let $(I,\mathcal{I},\mu)$ be the Wiener space defined over $[0,t']$, let $(J,\mathcal{J},\nu)$ be the Wiener space defined over $[0,T]$, and let $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ be the respective time-$t'$ and time-$T$ mappings of the SDE. Since $X_1$ is open, applying the "support theorem" [Theorem 3.3.1(b) of the Michel & Pardoux notes] to the reverse-time SDE gives that $\nu(x_2 \in \Psi(X_1))>0$. Hence the Lemma gives the desired result.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I asked with a similar question here, where I didn't assume a smooth diffusion coefficient. May you kindly have a look at the question? $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Jan 13, 2023 at 2:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .