3
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ and $Y$ be Tychonoff (i.e. completely regular Hausdorff) topological spaces and let $\varphi:X\to Y$ be a continuous surjection that also has a property that $\operatorname{int}\overline{\varphi(U)}\ne\varnothing$, for any open nonempty $U\subset X$ (this property is called skeletal, weakly open, almost open etc in various sources; equivalently, the preimage of any nowhere set is nowhere dense).

Let us consider the topology $\tau$ on $Y$ which is the strongest Tychonoff topology with respect to which $\varphi$ is continuous (this property for $\varphi$ as a map into $(Y,\tau)$ is called $\mathbb{R}$-quotient, which may be viewed as a quotient map in the category of Tychonoff spaces).

Is $\varphi$ still skeletal as a map from $X$ into $(Y,\tau)$?

This is true is $X$ is locally compact, so the counterexamples should be looked for outside of this class.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The answer to this question is negative. A suitable counterexample can be constructed as follows.

Let $Y=\mathbb R$ be the real line with the standard Euclidean topology. Let $\mathbb Q$ be the subspace of rational numbers in $\mathbb R$. Write $\mathbb R\setminus \mathbb Q$ as the union $\bigcup_{q\in \mathbb Q}X_q$ of pairwise disjoint dense sets in $\mathbb R$. Let $$X=\mathbb Q\oplus\bigoplus_{q\in \mathbb Q}(\{q\}\cup X_q)$$be the topological sum of the spaces $\mathbb Q$ and $\{q\}\cup X_q$ for $q\in\mathbb Q$.

Let $\varphi:X\to Y$ be the natural projection. It is clear that the spaces $X,Y$ are separable, metrizable (and hence Tychonoff) and the function $\varphi:X\to Y$ is skeletal.

On the other hand, in the $\mathbb R$-quotient topology $\tau$ on $Y=\mathbb R$, the set $\mathbb Q$ is closed and nowhere dense in $(Y,\tau)$, witnessing that the function $\varphi:X\to(Y,\tau)$ is not skeletal.

To show that $\mathbb Q$ is closed in $(Y,\tau)$, choose any point $y\in\mathbb R\setminus \mathbb Q$. Find $q\in\mathbb Q$ such that $y\in X_q$. Consider the function $f_q:Y\to\mathbb R$ defined by $f_q(x)=|x-q|$ if $x\in X_q$ and $f_q(x)=0$, otherwise.

Observe that the composition $f_q\circ \varphi:X\to\mathbb R$ is continuous, which implies that the set $X_q=\{x\in Y:f_q(x)>0\}$ is $\tau$-open, contain $y$, and does not intersect $\mathbb Q$. This completes the proof of the closedness of $\mathbb Q$.

Assuming that the closed set $\mathbb Q$ is not nowhere dense in $(Y,\tau)$, we can find a nonempty open set $U\subseteq\mathbb Q$. Choose any point $q\in U$ and observe that the preimage $\varphi^{-1}(U)$ is an open set in $X$ containing the point $q\in \{q\}\cup X_q$. Since $\{q\}$ is nowhere dense in $X_q$, the set $\varphi^{-1}(U)$ has nonempty intersection with the set $X_q$ and then $\emptyset \ne \varphi[X_q\cap \varphi^{-1}(U)]\subseteq U\cap X_q\subseteq U\setminus\mathbb Q$, which contradicts the choice of $U\subseteq\mathbb Q$.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! After the formula the second $\mathbb{Q}$ should be multiplied with $0$, right? $\endgroup$
    – erz
    Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, why is $X$ Tychonoff? $\endgroup$
    – erz
    Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ @erz Ups! Indeed, $X$ is not even regular. So, you accepted my answer too fast. I should think a bit more. Sorry for this gap. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ @erz Now I have corrected the example, so it is became Tychonoff. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 30, 2022 at 13:09
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think I understand your construction of $X$ and $\varphi$. If $X$ is a disjoint union of subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ which add up to $\mathbb{R}$, then $\varphi$ is the identity map, and so $(Y,\tau)=X$. So it is probably something else but i cannot surmise it from the solution $\endgroup$
    – erz
    Commented Jan 31, 2022 at 5:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .