20
$\begingroup$

Let $f(x)=\log|2\sin(x/2)|$ (the normalizing factor $2$ is chosen to have the average over the period equal to $0$). Does there exist $a>0$ such that all sums $\sum_{k=1}^n f(ak)\ge 0$? The computations (run up to the values of $n$ where I could not rely on the floating point precision any more) show that it may be the case even for $a=2\pi\sqrt 2$ but I'll be happy with any $a$ (or with a proof that no such $a$ exists).

This question came up in our joint study of Leja interpolation points with Volodymyr Andriyevskyy but the connection is a bit too convoluted to be explained here :-)

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have u seen B6 and solutions? $\endgroup$ Oct 15, 2021 at 0:50
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 No. I agree that it has the same spirit but I do not immediately see whether the techniques there yield anything in my case :-) $\endgroup$
    – fedja
    Oct 15, 2021 at 4:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yuval Peres and David Ralston have some papers on a closely related topic. They deal with continuous functions (unlike your function with a singularity), and prove the existence of what they call heavy points: these are exactly the points you are looking for where all sums are non-negative. $\endgroup$ Oct 15, 2021 at 5:00
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I don't know about non-negativity, but this beautiful paper shows that there is a uniform lower bound for this sum in the case $a = \pi(\sqrt{5}-1)$. There's also a lot of references, in particular about the continued fraction expansion of the potential $a$. $\endgroup$ Oct 15, 2021 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ Just a remark: judging by the outcome of numerical experiments, the choice $a = 2\pi\sqrt2$ seems to maximize the infimum of the sequence of sums (as you certainly know, but it might be interesting for the others). $\endgroup$ Oct 15, 2021 at 11:57

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

The answer to this question is yes, which is proved in the following paper that appeared on arXiv today. Specifically, part $(ii)$ of Theorem 2 of this paper, in the case $b = 1$, says that for $\beta = \frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}$ the smallest term of the sequence $$P_N(\beta) = \prod\limits_{r = 1}^N 2|\sin(\pi r\beta)|$$ is the first term $P_1(\beta)$ (this is the same as the sequence in OP up to denoting $a = 2\pi \beta$ and taking the exponent). Since $$P_1(\beta) = 2|\sin(\pi \beta)| = 1,86\ldots > 1,$$ the sequence in the OP for $a = 2\pi \beta$ is strictly positive and even has a uniform poisitve lower bound $\log(1,86\ldots) = 0,62\ldots$ .

Note also that the case $b = 2$ of the same Theorem gives us $\beta = \sqrt{2}-1$. By periodicity of sine, it's the same as $\beta' = \sqrt{2}$, which translates to $a = 2\pi \sqrt{2}$ from the OP. So, for this $a$ infimum is also the first term, which is also strictly positive.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.