1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that ${\bf x} \in\mathbb C^n$ is a complex random vector, we know the mean vector and covariance matrix of $\bf x$ are defined as follows: $${\bf m}_{\bf x} = \mathbb{E} ({\bf x}) \\ {\bf C}_{\bf x x} = \mathbb{E} (({\bf x}-{\bf m}_{\bf x})({\bf x}-{\bf m}_{\bf x})^H)$$ How is 4th order cumulant of a ${\bf \text{complex random vector}}$ such as ${\bf x} \in\mathbb C^n$ defined?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You need more information than the expected value and the variance to find the higher cumulants. $\endgroup$ Aug 2, 2021 at 2:23
  • $\begingroup$ I see: Given your way of (incorrectly) using the word "derive", I now suspect you meant to ask how the 4th-order cumulant is defined. $\endgroup$ Aug 2, 2021 at 2:45

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb C}\newcommand{\ip}[2]{\langle #1,#2\rangle}$First of all, cumulants are defined, rather than derived.

Now, let $X:=\mathbf x$. Suppose $E\|X\|^m<\infty$ for some natural $m$. Let $Y:=X-EX$. Then for the respective characteristic functions $f$ an $g$ of $X$ and $Y$ we have \begin{equation} f(s)=Ee^{i\ip Xs}=e^{i\ip{EX}s}Ee^{i\ip Ys}=e^{i\ip {EX}s}g(s), \end{equation} where $s\in\C^n$ and $\ip st:=\sum_{p=1}^ns_p\overline{t_p}$ for $s=(s_1,\dots,s_n)$ and $t=(t_1,\dots,t_n)$ in $\C^n$.

Then the cumulant of order $m$ of $X$ can be defined as the $m$-linear form/tensor on $\C^m$ that is $i^{-m}$ times the $m$th derivative $\ell^{(m)}(0)$ at $0\in\C^m$ of the function $\ell:=\ln f$. So, for any $s\in\C^n$, \begin{equation} \ell(s)=\ln f(s)=i\ip{EX}s+\ln g(s) \end{equation} and, for any $a,b,c,d$ in $\C^n$, \begin{equation} g'(s)(a)=i\,E\ip Ya e^{i\ip Ys},\quad g'(0)(a)=0, \end{equation} \begin{equation} g''(s)(a,b)=i^2\,E\ip Ya\ip Yb e^{i\ip Ys}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} g'''(s)(a,b,c)=i^3\,E\ip Ya\ip Yb\ip Yc e^{i\ip Ys}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} g''''(0)(a,b,c,d)=i^4\,E\ip Ya\ip Yb\ip Yc\ip Yd. \end{equation} So, for any $s\in\C^n$ and any $a,b,c,d$ in $\C^n$, \begin{equation} \ell'(s)(a)=\ip{EX}a+\frac1{g(s)}\,g'(s)(a), \end{equation} \begin{equation} \ell''(s)(a,b)=-\frac1{g(s)^2}\,g'(s)(a)g'(s)(b)+\frac1{g(s)}\,g''(s)(a,b), \end{equation} \begin{multline*} \ell'''(s)(a,b,c)=\frac2{g(s)^3}\,g'(s)(a)g'(s)(b)g'(s)(c) \\ -\frac1{g(s)^2}\,g''(s)(a,c)g'(s)(b)-\frac1{g(s)^2}\,g''(s)(b,c)g'(s)(a) -\frac1{g(s)^2}\,g''(s)(a,b)g'(s)(c) \\ +\frac1{g(s)}\,g'''(s)(a,b,c), \end{multline*} \begin{multline*} \ell''''(0)(a,b,c,d)= \\ -g''(0)(a,c)g'(s)(b,d)-g''(0)(a,d)g'(s)(b,c)-g''(0)(a,b)g'(s)(c,d) \\ +g''''(0)(a,b,c,d). \end{multline*}

So, the cumulant of order $4$ of $X$ is the quadrilinear form/tensor on $\C^4$ that is $\ell''''(0)$, and this quadrilinear form is defined by the formula \begin{multline*} \ell''''(0)(a_1,\dots,a_4) =E\prod_{j\in[4]}\ip Y{a_j} \\ -\frac12\,\sum_{J\in\binom{[4]}2}E\prod_{j\in J}\ip Y{a_j}\;E\prod_{k\in J^{\mathsf c}}\ip Y{a_k}, \end{multline*} where $a_1,\dots,a_4$ are in $\C^n$, $[4]:=\{1,2,3,4\}$, $J^{\mathsf c}:=[4]\setminus J$, and $\binom{[4]}2$ is the set of all subsets of cardinality $2$ of the set $[4]$.

So, the $n^4$ components of the tensor that is the cumulant of order $4$ of $X$ can be obtained by substituting for $a_1,\dots,a_4$ the standard basis vectors $e_1,\dots,e_n$ of $\C^n$. For instance, letting $(a_1,\dots,a_4)=(e_p,e_q,e_q,e_p)$ for distinct $p$ and $q$ in the set $[n]:=\{1,\dots,n\}$, we see that the $(p,q,q,p)$-component of the cumulant tensor is \begin{equation*} EY_p^2Y_q^2-EY_p^2\,EY_q^2-2(EY_pY_q)^2. \end{equation*}

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. In this paper, 4th order cumulant of ${\bf z}_g(t)$ is a $L^2 \times L^2$ matrix (equation (3.6)), where $L$ is the number of sensors. Is it correct to define 4th order cumulant of ${\bf z}_g(t)$ as $$ \mathbb{E} \left ( \left({\bf z}_g(t) \otimes {\bf z}^*_g(t)\right ) \left({\bf z}_g(t) \otimes {\bf z}^*_g(t)\right )^H\right )$$ where $\otimes$ is the Kronecker product? $\endgroup$
    – Milad A
    Aug 2, 2021 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ @MiladA : One can define anything and call it anything. The question is, how reasonable the definition is and on what principle(s) it is based. With your definition, in the case $L=1$, for the "cumulant" we get the fourth absolute moment, which is not what is usually called the fourth "one-dimensional" cumulant. $\endgroup$ Aug 2, 2021 at 13:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.