5
$\begingroup$

Let $(P,M,G)$ be a principal bundle with connection 1-form $\omega$. In all books I have seen so far, the curvature is defined by \begin{equation} F:=D_{\omega}\omega \in \Omega({P,\mathfrak{g}}) \end{equation} with \begin{equation} (D_{\omega}\omega)_p(X_1,...,X_k)=d \omega_p(X_1^H,...,X_k^H) \end{equation} where $X_i^H$ means the projection on the horizontal part. However wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_theory_(mathematics)) states, that the curvature can be also see as \begin{equation} F(X_1,X_2)=[X_1^\#,X_2^\#]-[X_1,X_2]^\# \in \Omega(M,ad(P)) \end{equation} where # denotes the horizontal lift of the vector fields. What is the exact connection of the two definitions. How can I derive them from each other. I would also be very grateful if someone could provide a reference where the definition wikipedia uses is discussed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Could you give a specific reference for your first version? $\endgroup$ May 13, 2021 at 6:47
  • $\begingroup$ E.g. Mathematical gauge theory by Hamilton $\endgroup$
    – NicAG
    May 13, 2021 at 11:25

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I'll use $\Omega \in \Omega^2(P,\mathfrak{g})$ to denote the curvature tensor of $\omega$. One way of identifying these two expressions is through Cartan's structure equation $$\Omega = d\omega + \frac{1}{2}\omega \wedge \omega.$$ A reference is Kobayashi-Nomitsu's book, Chapter II.5; here we use the convention $$d \omega(X,Y) = \frac{1}{2}(X \cdot \omega(Y) - Y \cdot \omega(X) - \omega([X,Y]))$$ where $X$ and $Y$ are local sections of $TP$.

Since $\Omega$ is horizontal and $\omega$ sends horizontal sections to $0$, we have $$\Omega(X,Y) = \Omega(X^H,Y^H) = -\frac{1}{2}\omega([X^H,Y^H]).$$ As $[X^H,Y^H]^H = [X,Y]^H$ and $\omega$ sends any local section to its vertical part, we have $$\omega([X^H,Y^H]) = [X^H,Y^H] - [X^H,Y^H]^H = [X^H,Y^H] - [X,Y]^H.$$ Finally, you can compare $\Omega(X,Y)$ with $F(X,Y)$ in your question through the canonical isomorphism from the subspace of $\Omega^2(P,\mathfrak{g})$ consisting of $G$-equivariant horizontal 2-forms to $\Omega^2(M,ad(P))$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ But $D_\omega\omega$ of the OP seems to be not a 2-form? As written, it has values on $k$-tuples of vector fields for all $k$ $\endgroup$ May 13, 2021 at 6:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @მამუკაჯიბლაძე It is a 2 form. I just wrote down the general expression for $D_{\omega} \omega$ if $\omega$ is a $k$-form $\endgroup$
    – NicAG
    May 13, 2021 at 11:26
  • $\begingroup$ @HYL Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I am just a bit confused. The expression for $\Omega$ then needs a $-1/2$ factor which is missing in wikipedia. $\endgroup$
    – NicAG
    May 13, 2021 at 11:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are two conventions defining $d \omega$ for a $k$-form $\omega$, according to whether there is a factor $\frac{1}{k+1}$ or not. In Kobayashi-Nomitsu's book, the factor $\frac{1}{k+1}$ is in the definition, this is why we have $\frac{1}{2}$ in the structure equation. $\endgroup$
    – HYL
    May 13, 2021 at 11:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Then there is maybe a mistake in the wikipedia article, because they also use the $1/2$ in the structure equation. $\endgroup$
    – NicAG
    May 13, 2021 at 13:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.