6
$\begingroup$

Consider the $L$-series defined by $$L_{\alpha,\chi}(s) = \sum_{n\geq 1} \frac{e^{2\pi i \alpha \Omega(n)} \chi(n)}{n^s} = \prod_p \left(1 - \frac{e^{2\pi i \alpha} \chi(p)}{p^s}\right)^{-1}.$$ It should have an analytic continuation the left of $\Re s = 1$. Does it have any poles other than (possibly) $s=1$? Does it satisfy a functional equation? Or rather (since this is why I want a functional equation): what kind of growth estimates do we have on $L_{\alpha,\chi}(\sigma + i t)$ for fixed $\sigma < 1$ and variable $t$, $|t|\to \infty$?

(I'm sure this function is known and has most likely been studied - I just do not remember where I have ever seen it.)

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

I dispute that this should be termed an "L-function", but anyway...

Taking logs for $\sigma>1$ you get

$$\log L_{\alpha,\chi}(s)=-\sum_p\sum_k{e(k\alpha)\chi(p^k)\over kp^{ks}}$$

So this is

$$\log L_{\alpha,\chi}(s)=-e(\alpha)\sum_p\sum_k{\chi(p^k)\over kp^{ks}} -\sum_p\sum_{k=1}^\infty{\chi(p^k)\over kp^{ks}}[e(k\alpha)-e(\alpha)]$$

and as the $k=1$ term in the latter double sum vanishes, this double sum, call it $G(s)$, is analytic for $\sigma>1/2$, and is bounded for $\sigma\ge \sigma_0$ there.

Exponentiating gives $$L_{\alpha,\chi}(s)=\exp(e(\alpha)\log L_{0,\chi}(s)+G(s))=L(s,\chi)^{e(\alpha)}\exp(G(s))$$

Thus: this gives an analytic continutation of ${L'_{\alpha,\chi}(s)\over L_{\alpha,\chi}(s)}$ to $\sigma>1/2$ away from zeros of $L(s,\chi)$, and similarly for $L_{\alpha,\chi}(s)$ though the zeros will now be branch points.

As for growth, you'd probably want to consider things in terms of the logarithm. For fixed $\sigma<1$, to get a fair-play asymptotic you'd likely have to assume that there are no zeros to the right of $\sigma$ of $L(s,\chi)$, or maybe additionally that $\sigma$ is not a limit point of real parts of zeros.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Should we call it a zeta function instead? $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2021 at 16:32
  • $\begingroup$ More seriously - this makes clear that it is necessary to work with a zero-free region, as $L_{\alpha,\chi}$ has essential singularities at any zeroes of $L(s,\chi)$ with $\Re s > 1/2$ (unless $\alpha$ is an integer or a half-integer). Thanks! $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2021 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ There's a problem here: $\log L(s;\chi)$ is not a single-valued function -- its derivative $-\frac{L'(s;\chi)}{L(s;\chi)}$ does continue to a single-valued meromorphic function, but it does not integrate to zero around the poles. Thus the continuation above only makes sense for $s$ in a zero-free region. $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2021 at 3:32
  • $\begingroup$ So I don't think your function continues to any region containing a circle around a simple zero, and in particular to take asymptotics on a vertical line $\sigma+it$ you need to assume there are no zeros on the line or to its right (there's no problem if the real parts converge to $\sigma$, since all you need is for the logarithm to be single-valued). $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2021 at 3:38
  • $\begingroup$ Final comment: the logarithmic derivative of $L_{\alpha,\chi}$ will continue as a single-valued function to $\Re(s)>\frac12$ so estimates for that will follow from estimates on the logarithmic derivative of $L(s;\chi)$ and the boundedness of $G'(s)$ (which is also an absolutely convergent Dirichlet series in the region $\sigma>\frac12$) $\endgroup$ Feb 25, 2021 at 3:41
-4
$\begingroup$

This preprint by Kaczorowski and Perelli may contain the pieces of information you're looking for: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10497

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ No, the $\Omega(n)$ is missing. $\endgroup$
    – Stopple
    Feb 24, 2021 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, good point. $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2021 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.